David A. Dame

1.2k total citations · 1 hit paper
29 papers, 820 citations indexed

About

David A. Dame is a scholar working on Insect Science, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Plant Science. According to data from OpenAlex, David A. Dame has authored 29 papers receiving a total of 820 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 19 papers in Insect Science, 12 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 9 papers in Plant Science. Recurrent topics in David A. Dame's work include Mosquito-borne diseases and control (12 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (9 papers) and Insect behavior and control techniques (9 papers). David A. Dame is often cited by papers focused on Mosquito-borne diseases and control (12 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (9 papers) and Insect behavior and control techniques (9 papers). David A. Dame collaborates with scholars based in United States, Austria and United Kingdom. David A. Dame's co-authors include Mark Q. Benedict, Gary G. Clark, Mike Service, Stephen L. Dobson, Luke Alphey, Romeo Bellini, H. R. Ford, Bart GJ Knols, A. S. Robinson and C. F. Curtis and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences and BioScience.

In The Last Decade

David A. Dame

29 papers receiving 765 citations

Hit Papers

Sterile-Insect Methods for Control of Mosquito-Borne Dise... 2009 2026 2014 2020 2009 100 200 300

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
David A. Dame United States 12 619 499 176 174 78 29 820
D. A. Dame United States 16 502 0.8× 414 0.8× 217 1.2× 204 1.2× 51 0.7× 54 772
H. R. Ford United States 12 311 0.5× 274 0.5× 107 0.6× 111 0.6× 44 0.6× 24 514
Roger J. Wood United Kingdom 13 454 0.7× 211 0.4× 189 1.1× 381 2.2× 84 1.1× 28 815
Paul Howell United States 12 280 0.5× 494 1.0× 166 0.9× 199 1.1× 56 0.7× 19 704
Mike Service United Kingdom 4 335 0.5× 358 0.7× 107 0.6× 86 0.5× 42 0.5× 6 532
Becky deBruyn United States 12 288 0.5× 312 0.6× 104 0.6× 211 1.2× 34 0.4× 21 529
Diane D. Lovin United States 13 360 0.6× 499 1.0× 137 0.8× 202 1.2× 48 0.6× 26 659
E. D. Kokwaro Kenya 13 229 0.4× 160 0.3× 116 0.7× 82 0.5× 95 1.2× 45 457
Hanano Yamada Austria 19 845 1.4× 655 1.3× 226 1.3× 154 0.9× 50 0.6× 59 1.0k
Melissa C. Hardstone United States 12 400 0.6× 234 0.5× 220 1.3× 238 1.4× 141 1.8× 13 635

Countries citing papers authored by David A. Dame

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David A. Dame's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David A. Dame with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David A. Dame more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David A. Dame

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David A. Dame. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David A. Dame. The network helps show where David A. Dame may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of David A. Dame

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David A. Dame. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David A. Dame based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with David A. Dame. David A. Dame is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Britch, Seth C., David A. Dame, M. V. Meisch, et al.. (2021). Spatial Repellents Protect Small Perimeters from Riceland Mosquitoes in a Warm-Humid Environment. Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association. 37(1). 41–45. 4 indexed citations
2.
Dame, David A., et al.. (2014). Field Evaluation of Four Spatial Repellent Devices Against Arkansas Rice-Land Mosquitoes. Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association. 30(1). 31–36. 20 indexed citations
3.
Dame, David A., C. F. Curtis, Mark Q. Benedict, A. S. Robinson, & Bart GJ Knols. (2009). Historical applications of induced sterilisation in field populations of mosquitoes. Malaria Journal. 8(S2). S2–S2. 146 indexed citations
4.
Alphey, Luke, Mark Q. Benedict, Romeo Bellini, et al.. (2009). Sterile-Insect Methods for Control of Mosquito-Borne Diseases: An Analysis. Vector-Borne and Zoonotic Diseases. 10(3). 295–311. 382 indexed citations breakdown →
5.
Meisch, M. V., et al.. (2007). COMPARISON OF DILUTE AND NEAT FORMULATIONS OF ANVIL® BY ULTRA-LOW VOLUME GROUND APPLICATION AGAINST ANOPHELES QUADRIMACULATUS IN ARKANSAS. Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association. 23(3). 312–314. 6 indexed citations
6.
Brown, James R., et al.. (2006). IMPACT OF LOW AERIAL APPLICATION RATES OF DIBROM 14® ON POTENTIAL VECTORS1. Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association. 22(1). 87–92. 1 indexed citations
7.
Meisch, M. V., et al.. (2006). Ground Ultra-low Volume Assessment of Aqua-kontrol®. Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association. 22(4). 758–759. 2 indexed citations
8.
Meisch, M. V., David A. Dame, & James R. Brown. (2005). AERIAL ULTRA-LOW–VOLUME ASSESSMENT OF ANVIL 10+10® AGAINST ANOPHELES QUADRIMACULATUS. Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association. 21(3). 301–301. 5 indexed citations
9.
Nasci, Roger S., et al.. (2001). Interventions: Vector Control and Public Education. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 951(1). 235–254. 5 indexed citations
10.
Dame, David A.. (1984). Control of insects of veterinary importance by genetic techniques. Preventive Veterinary Medicine. 2(1-4). 515–522. 2 indexed citations
11.
Dame, David A., et al.. (1983). Effects of Combinations of Irradiation and Chemosterilization on Mating Competitiveness of Culex quinquefasciatus Say1. Journal of Economic Entomology. 76(6). 1331–1334. 14 indexed citations
13.
Dame, David A., et al.. (1983). Fertility and Competitiveness of Culex quinquefasciatus Males Irradiated in Nitrogen1. Journal of Economic Entomology. 76(4). 821–823. 11 indexed citations
14.
Bailey, Donald L., et al.. (1983). Field Releases with Adults and Pupae of Toxorhynchites Rutilus Rutilus (Diptera: Culicidae). Journal of Medical Entomology. 20(3). 308–312. 4 indexed citations
15.
Lowe, R. E., et al.. (1980). Efficiency of Techniques for the Mass Release of Sterile Male Anopheles albimanus Wiedemann in El Salvador. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 29(4). 695–703. 21 indexed citations
16.
Bailey, Donald L., et al.. (1979). Sterlizing and Packaging Males of Anopheles Albimanus Wiedemann for Field Release. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 28(5). 902–908. 6 indexed citations
17.
Dame, David A.. (1974). Man against Tsetse Man against Tsetse: Struggle for Africa John J. McKelvey, Jr.. BioScience. 24(9). 530–530. 5 indexed citations
18.
Dame, David A. & H. R. Ford. (1968). Multiple mating ofGlossina morsitansWestw. and its potential effect on the sterile male technique. Bulletin of Entomological Research. 58(2). 213–219. 28 indexed citations
19.
Dame, David A. & H. R. Ford. (1966). Effect of the chemosterilant tepa on Glossina morsitans Westw.. Bulletin of Entomological Research. 56(4). 649–658. 36 indexed citations
20.
Dame, David A. & Claude H. Schmidt. (1964). P32-Labeled Semen for Mosquito Mating Studies2. Journal of Economic Entomology. 57(5). 669–672. 9 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026