Mark Q. Benedict

579 total citations
8 papers, 407 citations indexed

About

Mark Q. Benedict is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Insect Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Mark Q. Benedict has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 407 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Molecular Biology, 4 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 2 papers in Insect Science. Recurrent topics in Mark Q. Benedict's work include Malaria Research and Control (4 papers), Insect Resistance and Genetics (4 papers) and Mosquito-borne diseases and control (4 papers). Mark Q. Benedict is often cited by papers focused on Malaria Research and Control (4 papers), Insect Resistance and Genetics (4 papers) and Mosquito-borne diseases and control (4 papers). Mark Q. Benedict collaborates with scholars based in United States, Austria and Netherlands. Mark Q. Benedict's co-authors include Rebecca S. Levine, A. Townsend Peterson, Bart GJ Knols, Basil D. Brooke, Maureen Coetzee, Taiwo Samson Awolola, Lizette L. Koekemoer, Lei Zheng, Paul Howell and Jonathan Cox and has published in prestigious journals such as American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, Journal of Heredity and Malaria Journal.

In The Last Decade

Mark Q. Benedict

7 papers receiving 393 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Mark Q. Benedict United States 7 280 131 125 89 61 8 407
Chun-Xiao Li China 12 357 1.3× 190 1.5× 111 0.9× 153 1.7× 14 0.2× 31 483
Abdoulaye M. Touré United States 7 455 1.6× 265 2.0× 86 0.7× 40 0.4× 15 0.2× 8 569
Verena Pichler Italy 10 232 0.8× 132 1.0× 63 0.5× 62 0.7× 9 0.1× 26 297
Jennifer L. Gillett‐Kaufman United States 8 120 0.4× 162 1.2× 57 0.5× 151 1.7× 19 0.3× 51 364
Miguel Moreno‐García Mexico 13 278 1.0× 206 1.6× 53 0.4× 55 0.6× 13 0.2× 37 512
C Apiwathnasorn Thailand 12 231 0.8× 80 0.6× 35 0.3× 76 0.9× 11 0.2× 23 374
Vanessa L. White Australia 12 457 1.6× 493 3.8× 63 0.5× 103 1.2× 16 0.3× 17 661
Katherine Gleave United Kingdom 11 416 1.5× 94 0.7× 128 1.0× 178 2.0× 14 0.2× 16 506
Igor Filipović Australia 10 273 1.0× 281 2.1× 97 0.8× 75 0.8× 12 0.2× 13 428
Martha L. Quiñones Colombia 10 286 1.0× 45 0.3× 53 0.4× 55 0.6× 11 0.2× 12 357

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Q. Benedict

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Q. Benedict's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Q. Benedict with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Q. Benedict more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Q. Benedict

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Q. Benedict. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Q. Benedict. The network helps show where Mark Q. Benedict may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark Q. Benedict

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark Q. Benedict. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark Q. Benedict based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mark Q. Benedict. Mark Q. Benedict is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
1.
Benedict, Mark Q., et al.. (2010). Relationship of larval desiccation to Anopheles gambiae Giles and An. arabiensis Patton survival. Journal of Vector Ecology. 35(1). 116–123. 8 indexed citations
3.
Benedict, Mark Q., Peter d’Abbs, Stephen L. Dobson, et al.. (2008). Guidance for Contained Field Trials of Vector Mosquitoes Engineered to Contain a Gene Drive System: Recommendations of a Scientific Working Group. Vector-Borne and Zoonotic Diseases. 8(2). 127–166. 71 indexed citations
4.
Awolola, Taiwo Samson, Paul Howell, Lizette L. Koekemoer, et al.. (2005). Independent mutations in the Rdl locus confer dieldrin resistance to Anopheles gambiae and An. arabiensis. Insect Molecular Biology. 14(2). 179–183. 100 indexed citations
5.
Levine, Rebecca S., A. Townsend Peterson, & Mark Q. Benedict. (2004). Distribution of Members ofAnopheles quadrimaculatusSay s.l. (Diptera: Culicidae) and Implications for Their Roles in Malaria Transmission in the United States. Journal of Medical Entomology. 41(4). 607–613. 48 indexed citations
6.
Levine, Rebecca S., A. Townsend Peterson, & Mark Q. Benedict. (2004). GEOGRAPHIC AND ECOLOGIC DISTRIBUTIONS OF THE ANOPHELES GAMBIAE COMPLEX PREDICTED USING A GENETIC ALGORITHM. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 70(2). 105–109. 85 indexed citations
7.
Grossman, Genelle L., Cristina Rafferty, Malcolm J. Fraser, & Mark Q. Benedict. (2000). Rapid Communication The piggyBac element is capable of precise excision and transposition in cells and embryos of the mosquito, Anopheles gambiae.
8.
Benedict, Mark Q., et al.. (1996). Mutations in the Anopheles gambiae Pink-Eye and White Genes Define Distinct, Tightly Linked Eye-Color Loci. Journal of Heredity. 87(1). 48–53. 24 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026