Stephen L. Bieber

1.0k citations
29 papers · 757 indexed · h-index 15
Topics
Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (7 papers)Child Abuse and Trauma (7 papers)Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (5 papers)
Partner nations
United StatesGermany

In The Last Decade

Stephen L. Bieber

28 papers receiving 695 citations

Peers

Stephen L. Bieber
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 254
  • Sensory Systems 228
  • Clinical Psychology 206
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 140
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 115
Replace Jan C. Jackson with:
Jan C. Jackson United States
Mehmet K. Mahmut Australia
Géraldine Coppin Switzerland
Timothy D. Hackenberg United States
Joseph J. Franchina United States
Simon Chu United Kingdom
Pam Blundell-Birtill United Kingdom
W. Robert Batsell United States
Armen C. Arevian United States
Jack T. Tapp United States
Stephen L. Bieber relative to Jan C. Jackson United States Jan C. Jackson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.0×
Jan C. Jackson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen L. Bieber

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen L. Bieber's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen L. Bieber with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen L. Bieber more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen L. Bieber

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen L. Bieber. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen L. Bieber. The network helps show where Stephen L. Bieber may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stephen L. Bieber

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stephen L. Bieber. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stephen L. Bieber based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stephen L. Bieber. Stephen L. Bieber is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 10
2 9
3 5
4 14
5 29
6 12
7 36
8 15
9 11
10 120
11 36
12
Insanity plea: predicting not guilty by reason of insanity adjudications.
12
13 8
14 2
15 16
16 3
17 21
18 58
19 29
20 98

About Stephen L. Bieber

Stephen L. Bieber is a scholar working on Computational Mathematics, Clinical Psychology and Sensory Systems, having authored 29 papers that have together received 757 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (7 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (7 papers) and Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (228 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (254 citations) and Clinical Psychology (206 citations). Stephen L. Bieber has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include David V. Smith, Marion E. Frank, Jeffrey B. Travers, Richard L. Van Buskirk, Richard A. Pasewark, Neal E. A. Kroll, Stanley R. Parkinson, Theodore E. Parks, Henry J. Steadman and James D. Rose. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neurophysiology, The Journal of General Physiology and Behavioral Neuroscience.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026