Marion E. Frank

3.6k total citations
73 papers, 2.9k citations indexed

About

Marion E. Frank is a scholar working on Sensory Systems, Nutrition and Dietetics and Biomedical Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, Marion E. Frank has authored 73 papers receiving a total of 2.9k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 62 papers in Sensory Systems, 61 papers in Nutrition and Dietetics and 32 papers in Biomedical Engineering. Recurrent topics in Marion E. Frank's work include Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (62 papers), Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (61 papers) and Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies (32 papers). Marion E. Frank is often cited by papers focused on Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (62 papers), Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (61 papers) and Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies (32 papers). Marion E. Frank collaborates with scholars based in United States, Japan and Germany. Marion E. Frank's co-authors include Thomas P. Hettinger, Mark C. Whitehead, Janneane F. Gent, Robert J. Contreras, Geoffrey H. Nowlis, Bradley K. Formaker, April E. Mott, Carl Pfaffmann, David V. Smith and Stephen L. Bieber and has published in prestigious journals such as The Journal of Comparative Neurology, Journal of Neurophysiology and Brain Research.

In The Last Decade

Marion E. Frank

73 papers receiving 2.9k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Marion E. Frank United States 33 2.1k 2.0k 1.0k 735 406 73 2.9k
Wayne L. Silver United States 25 1.3k 0.6× 1.6k 0.8× 690 0.7× 713 1.0× 139 0.3× 39 2.4k
Steven L. Youngentob United States 32 1.2k 0.6× 2.1k 1.0× 641 0.6× 1.0k 1.4× 118 0.3× 66 2.7k
Minghong Ma United States 32 1.2k 0.6× 1.8k 0.9× 525 0.5× 1.6k 2.2× 192 0.5× 71 2.7k
Göran Hellekant United States 25 2.1k 1.0× 1.7k 0.8× 989 1.0× 389 0.5× 367 0.9× 60 2.8k
Nirupa Chaudhari United States 38 3.9k 1.8× 3.5k 1.7× 2.4k 2.3× 826 1.1× 580 1.4× 69 5.5k
Mark C. Whitehead United States 25 962 0.4× 873 0.4× 277 0.3× 672 0.9× 438 1.1× 40 1.8k
Johannes Gerber Germany 33 1.5k 0.7× 2.5k 1.2× 1.5k 1.4× 399 0.5× 55 0.1× 104 3.5k
Richard M. Costanzo United States 32 1.2k 0.6× 2.3k 1.1× 1.2k 1.2× 893 1.2× 32 0.1× 77 3.4k
Guoxiang Xiong United States 19 537 0.3× 511 0.3× 331 0.3× 335 0.5× 134 0.3× 41 2.0k
Daniel A. Deems United States 16 717 0.3× 1.0k 0.5× 440 0.4× 346 0.5× 61 0.2× 24 1.7k

Countries citing papers authored by Marion E. Frank

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Marion E. Frank's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Marion E. Frank with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Marion E. Frank more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Marion E. Frank

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Marion E. Frank. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Marion E. Frank. The network helps show where Marion E. Frank may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Marion E. Frank

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Marion E. Frank. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Marion E. Frank based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Marion E. Frank. Marion E. Frank is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Fischer, Christian, Marion E. Frank, Pierre Kunz, et al.. (2016). Dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) after open and minimally invasive locked plating of proximal humerus fractures. Injury. 47(8). 1725–1731. 27 indexed citations
2.
Koide, Tsuyoshi, Aki Takahashi, Toshihiko Shiroishi, et al.. (2011). B6-MSM Consomic Mouse Strains Reveal Multiple Loci for Genetic Variation in Sucrose Octaacetate Aversion. Behavior Genetics. 41(5). 716–723. 6 indexed citations
3.
Frank, Marion E., et al.. (2010). Time and Intensity Factors in Identification of Components of Odor Mixtures. Chemical Senses. 35(9). 777–787. 16 indexed citations
4.
Frank, Marion E., et al.. (2007). Characteristic component odors emerge from mixtures after selective adaptation. Brain Research Bulletin. 72(1). 1–9. 39 indexed citations
5.
Frank, Marion E.. (2005). What the Tongue Tells the Brain about Taste. Chemical Senses. 30(Supplement 1). i68–i69. 16 indexed citations
6.
Gent, Janneane F., David Shafer, & Marion E. Frank. (2003). The effect of orthognathic surgery on taste function on the palate and tongue. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 61(7). 766–773. 17 indexed citations
7.
Frank, Marion E., Bradley K. Formaker, & Thomas P. Hettinger. (2003). Taste response to mixtures: Analytic processing of quality.. Behavioral Neuroscience. 117(2). 228–235. 37 indexed citations
8.
Shafer, David, et al.. (1999). Gustatory function after third molar extraction. Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology and Endodontology. 87(4). 419–428. 37 indexed citations
9.
Hettinger, Thomas P., Janneane F. Gent, Lawrence E. Marks, & Marion E. Frank. (1999). study of taste perception. Perception & Psychophysics. 61(8). 1510–1521. 32 indexed citations
10.
Formaker, Bradley K., et al.. (1997). Opponent effects of quinine and sucrose on single fiber taste responses of the chorda tympani nerve. Brain Research. 772(1-2). 239–242. 35 indexed citations
11.
Cain, Peter, Marion E. Frank, & Michael A. Barry. (1996). Recovery of Chorda Tympani Nerve Function Following Injury. Experimental Neurology. 141(2). 337–346. 41 indexed citations
12.
Rehnberg, Bradley G., et al.. (1996). Analysis of polysaccharide taste in hamsters: Behavioral and neural studies. Physiology & Behavior. 59(3). 505–516. 19 indexed citations
13.
Barry, Michael A., et al.. (1993). Loss and recovery of sodium-salt taste following bilateral chorda tympani nerve crush. Physiology & Behavior. 53(1). 75–80. 28 indexed citations
14.
Halsell, Christopher B. & Marion E. Frank. (1992). Organization of taste-evoked activity in the hamster parabrachial nucleus. Brain Research. 572(1-2). 286–290. 7 indexed citations
15.
Hettinger, Thomas P. & Marion E. Frank. (1992). Information processing in mammalian gustatory systems. Current Opinion in Neurobiology. 2(4). 469–478. 24 indexed citations
16.
Barry, Michael A. & Marion E. Frank. (1992). Response of the gustatory system to peripheral nerve injury. Experimental Neurology. 115(1). 60–64. 27 indexed citations
17.
Hettinger, Thomas P., et al.. (1990). Taste-responsive neurons and their locations in the solitary nucleus of the hamster. Neuroscience. 34(3). 745–758. 50 indexed citations
18.
Frank, Marion E., Stephen L. Bieber, & David V. Smith. (1988). The organization of taste sensibilities in hamster chorda tympani nerve fibers.. The Journal of General Physiology. 91(6). 861–896. 120 indexed citations
19.
Frank, Marion E., et al.. (1980). Sensitivities of single nerve fibers in the hamster chorda tympani to mixtures of taste stimuli.. The Journal of General Physiology. 76(2). 143–173. 52 indexed citations
20.
Frank, Marion E., et al.. (1980). Effects of binary taste stimuli on the neural activity of the hamster chorda tympani.. The Journal of General Physiology. 76(2). 125–142. 59 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026