Stephen Jones

853 citations
37 papers · 435 indexed · h-index 11

Stephen Jones

33 papers receiving 384 citations

Peers

Stephen Jones
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Sociology and Political Science 323
  • Health 47
  • Political Science and International Relations 113
  • General Health Professions 70
  • Education 70
Replace Khalil Gibran Muhammad with:
Khalil Gibran Muhammad Indonesia
Graziella Moraes Silva Brazil
Katarina Thomson United Kingdom
Andrew Schaap United Kingdom
Gerald Turkel United States
Marco Maraffi Italy
Vassilis S. Tsianos Germany
Traci Burch United States
Amanda Haynes Ireland
Kenan Malik
Stephen Jones relative to Khalil Gibran Muhammad Indonesia Khalil Gibran Muhammad's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Khalil Gibran Muhammad · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Jones

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Jones's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Jones with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Jones more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Jones

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Jones. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Jones. The network helps show where Stephen Jones may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 15 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Jones, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen Jones Line = papers co-authored together Stephen Jones links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20233
2 20235
3 20211
4 20205
5 202012
6 201923
7 201712
8 20171
9 20166
10 20152
11 201580
12 20148
13
Religion and Knowledge
20123
14
The New Prevent: Will it Work? Can it Work?
20122
15
The Uses and Impact of HEFCE Funding for Widening Participation
20127
16
The New Prevent: Will It Work? Can It Work?’ Muslim Participation in Contemporary Governance Working Paper, No. 2,
20113
17
Religious Literacy Leadership in Higher Education: an analysis of key issues and challenges for university leaders
20104
18 20073
19 200612
20
Towards eGovernment in the National Assembly for Wales (UK): an empirical analysis
20062

About Stephen Jones

Stephen Jones is a scholar working on Health, Sociology and Political Science and History and Philosophy of Science, having authored 37 papers that have together received 435 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Religion and Society Interactions (13 papers), Religion, Society, and Development (12 papers), Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (7 papers), Religious Education and Schools (4 papers), Education and Islamic Studies (4 papers), Migration, Refugees, and Integration (4 papers), Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence (3 papers) and Islamic Studies and History (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sociology and Political Science (323 citations), Health (47 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (113 citations). Stephen Jones has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include David W. Lewis, Brenda Lee, Therese O’Toole, Daniel Nilsson DeHanas, Tariq Modood, Nasar Meer, Adam Dinham, David Clarke, Nasar Meer and Greg White. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Contemporary Religion, British Journal of Sociology, Political Geography, Sociology Compass and Public Understanding of Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026