Stephen Jones
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Political Science and International Relations top 5%
- General Health Professions
- Education top 10%
- Health
- Co-authors
- David W. LewisBrenda LeeTherese O’TooleDaniel Nilsson DeHanasTariq ModoodNasar MeerAdam DinhamDavid Clarke
- Topics
- Religion and Society Interactions (13 papers)Religion, Society, and Development (12 papers)Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (7 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaSocial ForcesBritish Journal of Sociology
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesGermany
In The Last Decade
Stephen Jones
33 papers receiving 384 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
- Sociology and Political Science 323
- Political Science and International Relations 113
- General Health Professions 70
- Education 70
- Health 47
Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Jones
This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Jones's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Jones with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Jones more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Jones
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Jones. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Jones. The network helps show where Stephen Jones may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stephen Jones
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stephen Jones. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stephen Jones based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stephen Jones. Stephen Jones is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 5 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 12 | |
| 6 | 23 | |
| 7 | 12 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 6 | |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | 80 | |
| 12 | 8 | |
| 13 | Religion and Knowledge | 3 |
| 14 | The New Prevent: Will it Work? Can it Work? | 2 |
| 15 | The Uses and Impact of HEFCE Funding for Widening Participation | 7 |
| 16 | The New Prevent: Will It Work? Can It Work?’ Muslim Participation in Contemporary Governance Working Paper, No. 2, | 3 |
| 17 | Religious Literacy Leadership in Higher Education: an analysis of key issues and challenges for university leaders | 4 |
| 18 | 3 | |
| 19 | 12 | |
| 20 | Towards eGovernment in the National Assembly for Wales (UK): an empirical analysis | 2 |
About Stephen Jones
Stephen Jones is a scholar working on Health, Sociology and Political Science and History and Philosophy of Science, having authored 37 papers that have together received 435 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Religion and Society Interactions (13 papers), Religion, Society, and Development (12 papers) and Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sociology and Political Science (323 citations), Health (47 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (113 citations). Stephen Jones has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include David W. Lewis, Brenda Lee, Therese O’Toole, Daniel Nilsson DeHanas, Tariq Modood, Nasar Meer, Adam Dinham, David Clarke, Nasar Meer and Greg White. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Social Forces and British Journal of Sociology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.