Stephen J. Tucker

9.1k total citations · 1 hit paper
131 papers, 6.9k citations indexed

About

Stephen J. Tucker is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, Stephen J. Tucker has authored 131 papers receiving a total of 6.9k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 108 papers in Molecular Biology, 43 papers in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and 28 papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in Stephen J. Tucker's work include Ion channel regulation and function (99 papers), Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (42 papers) and Cardiac Ischemia and Reperfusion (26 papers). Stephen J. Tucker is often cited by papers focused on Ion channel regulation and function (99 papers), Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (42 papers) and Cardiac Ischemia and Reperfusion (26 papers). Stephen J. Tucker collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Germany. Stephen J. Tucker's co-authors include Frances M. Ashcroft, Fiona M. Gribble, Mark S.P. Sansom, Stefan Trapp, Thomas Baukrowitz, Chao Zhao, Mauro Pessia, Prafulla Aryal, Peter Proks and Maria Cristina D’Adamo and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Science and Cell.

In The Last Decade

Stephen J. Tucker

130 papers receiving 6.8k citations

Hit Papers

Truncation of Kir6.2 produces ATP-sensitive K+ channels i... 1997 2026 2006 2016 1997 200 400 600

Peers

Stephen J. Tucker
William A. Coetzee United States
J. Hescheler Germany
Barbara E. Ehrlich United States
Christopher Huang United Kingdom
Lothar A. Blatter United States
William A. Coetzee United States
Stephen J. Tucker
Citations per year, relative to Stephen J. Tucker Stephen J. Tucker (= 1×) peers William A. Coetzee

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen J. Tucker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen J. Tucker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen J. Tucker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen J. Tucker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen J. Tucker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen J. Tucker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen J. Tucker. The network helps show where Stephen J. Tucker may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stephen J. Tucker

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stephen J. Tucker. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stephen J. Tucker based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stephen J. Tucker. Stephen J. Tucker is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Rödström, Karin E. J., Kathryn Smith, A.C.W. Pike, et al.. (2024). Extracellular modulation of TREK-2 activity with nanobodies provides insight into the mechanisms of K2P channel regulation. Nature Communications. 15(1). 4173–4173. 3 indexed citations
2.
Tucker, Stephen J., et al.. (2023). Limitations of non-polarizable force fields in describing anion binding poses in non-polar synthetic hosts. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics. 25(26). 17596–17608. 2 indexed citations
3.
Martinez‐Seara, Hector, et al.. (2023). Influence of electronic polarization on the binding of anions to a chloride-pumping rhodopsin. Biophysical Journal. 122(8). 1548–1556. 7 indexed citations
4.
Lynch, Charlotte I., et al.. (2022). Influence of effective polarization on ion and water interactions within a biomimetic nanopore. Biophysical Journal. 121(11). 2014–2026. 6 indexed citations
5.
Omari, Kamel El, et al.. (2022). Structural basis for proton coupled cystine transport by cystinosin. Nature Communications. 13(1). 4845–4845. 14 indexed citations
6.
Biggin, Philip C., et al.. (2022). When is a hydrophobic gate not a hydrophobic gate?. The Journal of General Physiology. 154(11). 6 indexed citations
7.
Proks, Peter, Marcus Schewe, Linus J. Conrad, et al.. (2021). Norfluoxetine inhibits TREK-2 K2P channels by multiple mechanisms including state-independent effects on the selectivity filter gate. The Journal of General Physiology. 153(8). 19 indexed citations
8.
Tucker, Stephen J., et al.. (2021). Ion channels as convergence points in the pathology of pulmonary arterial hypertension. Biochemical Society Transactions. 49(4). 1855–1865. 7 indexed citations
9.
Klesse, Gianni, Shanlin Rao, Stephen J. Tucker, & Mark S.P. Sansom. (2020). Induced Polarization in Molecular Dynamics Simulations of the 5-HT 3 Receptor Channel. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 142(20). 9415–9427. 37 indexed citations
10.
Klesse, Gianni, Stephen J. Tucker, & Mark S.P. Sansom. (2020). Electric Field Induced Wetting of a Hydrophobic Gate in a Model Nanopore Based on the 5-HT 3 Receptor Channel. ACS Nano. 14(8). 10480–10491. 26 indexed citations
11.
Syrjänen, Johanna L., Kevin Michalski, Tsung‐Han Chou, et al.. (2020). Structure and assembly of calcium homeostasis modulator proteins. Nature Structural & Molecular Biology. 27(2). 150–159. 63 indexed citations
12.
Rao, Shanlin, Gianni Klesse, Phillip J. Stansfeld, Stephen J. Tucker, & Mark S.P. Sansom. (2019). A heuristic derived from analysis of the ion channel structural proteome permits the rapid identification of hydrophobic gates. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 116(28). 13989–13995. 50 indexed citations
13.
Dong, Yin Yao, A.C.W. Pike, Alexandra Mackenzie, et al.. (2015). K2P channel gating mechanisms revealed by structures of TREK-2 and a complex with Prozac. Science. 347(6227). 1256–1259. 237 indexed citations
14.
Aryal, Prafulla, Mark S.P. Sansom, & Stephen J. Tucker. (2014). Hydrophobic Gating in Ion Channels. Journal of Molecular Biology. 427(1). 121–130. 214 indexed citations
15.
Rapedius, Markus, Chetan Sharma, Phillip J. Stansfeld, et al.. (2012). State-independent intracellular access of quaternary ammonium blockers to the pore of TREK-1. Channels. 6(6). 473–478. 34 indexed citations
16.
Paulais, Marc, May Bloch-Faure, Nicolas Picard, et al.. (2011). Renal phenotype in mice lacking the Kir5.1 ( Kcnj16 ) K + channel subunit contrasts with that observed in SeSAME/EAST syndrome. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 108(25). 10361–10366. 85 indexed citations
17.
Gupta, Sayan, et al.. (2010). Conformational Changes During the Gating of a Potassium Channel Revealed by Structural Mass Spectrometry. Structure. 18(7). 839–846. 65 indexed citations
18.
Sarkies, Peter, et al.. (2008). Genetic selection of activatory mutations in KcsA. Channels. 2(6). 413–418. 15 indexed citations
19.
Rapedius, Markus, Malle Soom, Ekaterina Shumilina, et al.. (2005). Long Chain CoA Esters as Competitive Antagonists of Phosphatidylinositol 4,5-Bisphosphate Activation in Kir Channels. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 280(35). 30760–30767. 34 indexed citations
20.
Trapp, Stefan, Stephen J. Tucker, & Frances M. Ashcroft. (1998). Mechanism of ATP-sensitive K Channel Inhibition by Sulfhydryl Modification. The Journal of General Physiology. 112(3). 325–332. 32 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026