Stephen Hicks

40 papers receiving 826 citations

Peers

Stephen Hicks
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
  • Public Administration 157
  • Reproductive Medicine 340
  • Safety Research 215
  • Social Psychology 510
  • Gender Studies 150
Replace Eric Swank with:
Eric Swank United States
Rowena Fong United States
Eva Lloyd United Kingdom
John Eekelaar United States
Glenda M. Russell United States
Jacqui Gabb United Kingdom
Judy Cashmore Australia
Peter L. Strauss Germany
Jill Reynolds United Kingdom
Maureen Baker New Zealand
Stephen Hicks relative to Eric Swank United States Eric Swank's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Eric Swank · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Hicks

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Hicks's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Hicks with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Hicks more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Hicks

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Hicks. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Hicks. The network helps show where Stephen Hicks may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Hicks, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen Hicks Line = papers co-authored together Stephen Hicks links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 44 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201387
2 200565
3 200064
4 200658
5 200850
6 201649
7
Explaining Postmodernism: Skepticism and Socialism from Rousseau to Foucault
200445
8 200842
9 201442
10 201140
11
Lesbian and Gay Fostering and Adoption: Extraordinary Yet Ordinary
199935
12 200533
13 200932
14 200530
15 200526
16 199625
17 201624
18 200320
19 201618
20 201317

About Stephen Hicks

Stephen Hicks is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Reproductive Medicine, Safety Research, Sociology and Political Science and General Health Professions, having authored 44 papers that have together received 943 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy (18 papers), Reproductive Health and Technologies (12 papers), Child Welfare and Adoption (9 papers), Feminism, Gender, and Sexuality Studies (6 papers), Social Work Education and Practice (6 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (6 papers), Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism (4 papers) and Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (157 citations), Reproductive Medicine (340 citations), Safety Research (215 citations), Social Psychology (510 citations) and Gender Studies (150 citations). Stephen Hicks has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Paul Allin, Alys Young, Dharman Jeyasingham, Katherine Watson, Camilla Lewis, Vanessa May, Corinne May‐Chahal, Tommy Dickinson, Gerhard Sedlacek and Mark Pilling. Their work appears in journals such as Qualitative Social Work, The British Journal of Social Work, Sociological Research Online, International Journal of Social Welfare and Sexualities.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact