STEPHEN G. S. HATFIELD
- Plant Science top 5%
- Molecular Biology
- Food Science top 10%
- Biochemistry top 10%
- Cell Biology
- Co-authors
- Michael KneeO. P. JonesBrian D. PattersonIan M. BartleyNorman E. LooneyStephen M. SmithS. M. SmithWilliam J. Bramlage
- Topics
- Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management (11 papers)Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies (10 papers)Horticultural and Viticultural Research (5 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Experimental BotanyJournal of the Science of Food and AgricultureInternational Journal of Food Science & Technology
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
STEPHEN G. S. HATFIELD
14 papers receiving 418 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 36
- Plant Science 424
- Molecular Biology 122
- Food Science 83
- Biochemistry 52
- Cell Biology 33
Countries citing papers authored by STEPHEN G. S. HATFIELD
This map shows the geographic impact of STEPHEN G. S. HATFIELD's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by STEPHEN G. S. HATFIELD with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites STEPHEN G. S. HATFIELD more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by STEPHEN G. S. HATFIELD
This network shows the impact of papers produced by STEPHEN G. S. HATFIELD. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by STEPHEN G. S. HATFIELD. The network helps show where STEPHEN G. S. HATFIELD may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of STEPHEN G. S. HATFIELD
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of STEPHEN G. S. HATFIELD. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of STEPHEN G. S. HATFIELD based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with STEPHEN G. S. HATFIELD. STEPHEN G. S. HATFIELD is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | 21 | |
| 3 | 61 | |
| 4 | 8 | |
| 5 | 11 | |
| 6 | 71 | |
| 7 | 42 | |
| 8 | 30 | |
| 9 | 92 | |
| 10 | 4 | |
| 11 | 25 | |
| 12 | 10 | |
| 13 | 44 | |
| 14 | 49 |
About STEPHEN G. S. HATFIELD
STEPHEN G. S. HATFIELD is a scholar working on Plant Science, Cell Biology and Food Science, having authored 14 papers that have together received 472 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management (11 papers), Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies (10 papers) and Horticultural and Viticultural Research (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Plant Science (424 citations), Biochemistry (52 citations) and Food Science (83 citations). STEPHEN G. S. HATFIELD has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Michael Knee, O. P. Jones, Brian D. Patterson, Ian M. Bartley, Norman E. Looney, Stephen M. Smith, S. M. Smith, William J. Bramlage, Eleni Tsantili and Dudley I. Farman. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Experimental Botany, Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture and International Journal of Food Science & Technology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.