Stephen Elms
Impact in
-
- Forest ecology and management
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
- Insect Science top 10%
- Insect-Plant Interactions and Control
- Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies
Papers in
-
- Forest ecology and management 11
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies 7
- Ecology 8
- Forest Insect Ecology and Management 8
- Co-authors
- P. Hopmans (3 shared papers)Thomas Baker (4 shared papers)David I. Forrester (4 shared papers)Ian Smith (3 shared papers)David Smith (2 shared papers)Elizabeth A. Pinkard (2 shared papers)Jeremy Brawner (3 shared papers)Ross Corkrey (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Forest Ecology and Management (4 papers)Australian Forestry (3 papers)G3 Genes Genomes Genetics (2 papers)Journal of Chemical Ecology (1 paper)Tree Physiology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited StatesSwitzerland
In The Last Decade
Stephen Elms
18 papers receiving 278 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 32
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 121
- Insect Science 85
- Global and Planetary Change 109
- Ecology 104
- Forestry 10
Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Elms
This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Elms's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Elms with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Elms more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Elms
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Elms. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Elms. The network helps show where Stephen Elms may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Elms, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2011 | 41 | |
| 2 | 2012 | 36 | |
| 3 | 2009 | 34 | |
| 4 | 2009 | 28 | |
| 5 | 2021 | 28 | |
| 6 | 2020 | 16 | |
| 7 | 2008 | 16 | |
| 8 | 2021 | 15 | |
| 9 | 2024 | 14 | |
| 10 | 2008 | 14 | |
| 11 | 2020 | 10 | |
| 12 | 2020 | 8 | |
| 13 | 2022 | 7 | |
| 14 | 2009 | 7 | |
| 15 | 2017 | 6 | |
| 16 | 2012 | 6 | |
| 17 | 2013 | 5 | |
| 18 | 2021 | 3 | |
| 19 | 2025 | 0 |
About Stephen Elms
Stephen Elms is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Insect Science and Global and Planetary Change, having authored 19 papers that have together received 294 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forest ecology and management (11 papers), Forest Insect Ecology and Management (8 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (7 papers), Plant and animal studies (4 papers), Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (4 papers), Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (3 papers), Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (2 papers) and Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (121 citations), Insect Science (85 citations), Global and Planetary Change (109 citations), Ecology (104 citations) and Forestry (10 citations). Stephen Elms has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include P. Hopmans, Thomas Baker, David I. Forrester, Ian Smith, David Smith, Elizabeth A. Pinkard, Jeremy Brawner, Ross Corkrey, CL Mohammed and C. L. Beadle. Their work appears in journals such as Forest Ecology and Management, Australian Forestry, G3 Genes Genomes Genetics, Journal of Chemical Ecology and Tree Physiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.