Stephen E. Lewis

28 papers receiving 284 citations

Peers

Stephen E. Lewis
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
  • General Engineering 9
  • Mechanics of Materials 148
  • Mechanical Engineering 190
  • Cultural Studies 23
  • Philosophy 23
Replace Jean-Jacques Thomas with:
Jean-Jacques Thomas France
Pierre Arnaud France
Pierre Lory France
Luis de León Germany
Hans Andersson Sweden
William R. Braisted United States
Colin Sterling United States
Warren Brown United States
Todd F. Davis United States
Dennis Moore United States
Stephen E. Lewis relative to Jean-Jacques Thomas France Jean-Jacques Thomas's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Jean-Jacques Thomas · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen E. Lewis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen E. Lewis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen E. Lewis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen E. Lewis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen E. Lewis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen E. Lewis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen E. Lewis. The network helps show where Stephen E. Lewis may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 21 scholars most cited alongside Stephen E. Lewis, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen E. Lewis Line = papers co-authored together Stephen E. Lewis links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201363
2 201754
3 201244
4 201627
5 201218
6 201212
7 201012
8 201311
9 19739
10
La guerra del "posh", 1951-1954: un conflicto decisivo entre el Instituto Nacional Indigenista, el monopolio del alcohol y el gobierno del estado de Chiapas
20048
11 20098
12 20088
13 19976
14 19946
15 20105
16 20235
17 20155
18 20094
19 19833
20 19943

About Stephen E. Lewis

Stephen E. Lewis is a scholar working on Cultural Studies, Mechanical Engineering, Political Science and International Relations, Demography and Mechanics of Materials, having authored 31 papers that have together received 326 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Politics and Society in Latin America (7 papers), Indigenous Cultures and Socio-Education (7 papers), Railway Engineering and Dynamics (5 papers), Mechanical stress and fatigue analysis (3 papers), Advanced MEMS and NEMS Technologies (3 papers), Semiconductor Lasers and Optical Devices (3 papers), Historical Studies in Latin America (2 papers) and Adhesion, Friction, and Surface Interactions (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Engineering (9 citations), Mechanics of Materials (148 citations), Mechanical Engineering (190 citations), Cultural Studies (23 citations) and Philosophy (23 citations). Stephen E. Lewis has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Roger Lewis, Ulf Olofsson, David Fletcher, Jean-Luc Marion, Saeed Abbasi, Yi Zhu, Wenjian Wang, Tom Slatter, Eric Magel and Nesbitt W. Hagood. Their work appears in journals such as Latin American Perspectives, Wear, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part F Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, Radical History Review and Ethnohistory.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact