Stephen Dopkins

635 total citations
48 papers, 462 citations indexed

About

Stephen Dopkins is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Stephen Dopkins has authored 48 papers receiving a total of 462 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 36 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 23 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology and 13 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Stephen Dopkins's work include Child and Animal Learning Development (16 papers), Memory Processes and Influences (15 papers) and Spatial Cognition and Navigation (10 papers). Stephen Dopkins is often cited by papers focused on Child and Animal Learning Development (16 papers), Memory Processes and Influences (15 papers) and Spatial Cognition and Navigation (10 papers). Stephen Dopkins collaborates with scholars based in United States and Canada. Stephen Dopkins's co-authors include Jerome L. Myers, Celia M. Klin, Jesse Sargent, Catherine Ngo, John W. Philbeck, Richard Kovner, Erich Goldmeier, David Chichka, Jill B. Rich and Jason Brandt and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition, Journal of Memory and Language and Memory & Cognition.

In The Last Decade

Stephen Dopkins

42 papers receiving 426 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Stephen Dopkins United States 12 304 247 132 62 56 48 462
Buddhika Bellana Canada 10 409 1.3× 136 0.6× 82 0.6× 26 0.4× 26 0.5× 17 513
Jennifer Legault United States 8 378 1.2× 298 1.2× 111 0.8× 25 0.4× 41 0.7× 12 646
M. Helen Southwood United States 10 194 0.6× 93 0.4× 203 1.5× 52 0.8× 12 0.2× 19 408
Maria Montefinese Italy 13 418 1.4× 119 0.5× 281 2.1× 106 1.7× 35 0.6× 35 670
Terry Halwes United States 10 471 1.5× 271 1.1× 396 3.0× 102 1.6× 42 0.8× 17 774
Michael D. Anes United States 11 615 2.0× 200 0.8× 132 1.0× 63 1.0× 47 0.8× 12 688
Janet I. Vousden United Kingdom 14 364 1.2× 291 1.2× 165 1.3× 73 1.2× 22 0.4× 23 567
Denise H. Wu Taiwan 15 623 2.0× 494 2.0× 217 1.6× 32 0.5× 25 0.4× 34 926
Dianne Bradley Australia 10 394 1.3× 339 1.4× 191 1.4× 68 1.1× 21 0.4× 15 539
Jeffrey Coney Australia 13 455 1.5× 229 0.9× 149 1.1× 14 0.2× 12 0.2× 33 572

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Dopkins

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Dopkins's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Dopkins with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Dopkins more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Dopkins

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Dopkins. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Dopkins. The network helps show where Stephen Dopkins may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stephen Dopkins

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stephen Dopkins. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stephen Dopkins based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stephen Dopkins. Stephen Dopkins is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Dopkins, Stephen, et al.. (2023). Direction and distance information in memory for locations of objects relative to landmarks and boundaries. Memory & Cognition. 51(6). 1431–1443. 2 indexed citations
2.
Dopkins, Stephen, et al.. (2020). Horizontal–vertical anisotropy with respect to bias and sensitivity. Journal of Vision. 20(7). 1–1. 3 indexed citations
3.
Dopkins, Stephen, et al.. (2017). Variation in the standard deviation of the lure rating distribution: Implications for estimates of recollection probability. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 24(5). 1658–1664. 2 indexed citations
4.
Dopkins, Stephen, Jesse Sargent, & Catherine Ngo. (2012). Exploring the mental representation underlying familiarity assessment.. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale. 67(2). 140–152. 1 indexed citations
5.
Dopkins, Stephen, Jesse Sargent, & Catherine Ngo. (2010). The bias for a recognition judgement depends on the response emitted in a prior recognition judgement. Memory. 18(3). 272–283. 4 indexed citations
6.
Ngo, Catherine, Anne Brown, Jesse Sargent, & Stephen Dopkins. (2010). Effects of conceptual processing on familiarity-based recognition.. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale. 64(1). 67–76. 4 indexed citations
7.
Sargent, Jesse, Stephen Dopkins, John W. Philbeck, & David Chichka. (2010). Chunking in spatial memory.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition. 36(3). 576–589. 30 indexed citations
8.
Dopkins, Stephen, Catherine Ngo, & Jesse Sargent. (2006). Exploring a recognition-induced recognition decrement. Memory & Cognition. 34(4). 839–853. 3 indexed citations
9.
Dopkins, Stephen. (2005). Access to dimensional values can be unselective during early perceptual processing. Perception & Psychophysics. 67(3). 513–530. 3 indexed citations
10.
Ngo, Catherine, et al.. (2004). Loss of Distinctive Features and a Broader Pattern of Priming in Alzheimer's Disease.. Neuropsychology. 18(4). 603–612. 19 indexed citations
11.
Dopkins, Stephen & Catherine Ngo. (2001). The contribution of category relationships to similarity ratings.. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale. 55(3). 244–252. 1 indexed citations
12.
Dopkins, Stephen, et al.. (2001). Words in a sentence become less accessible when an anaphor is resolved. Memory & Cognition. 29(2). 355–362. 6 indexed citations
13.
Dopkins, Stephen. (1997). Text representations as reflected in patterns of cognitive distance. Memory & Cognition. 25(1). 72–95.
14.
Dopkins, Stephen. (1996). Representation of superordinate goal inferences in memory. Discourse Processes. 21(1). 85–104. 17 indexed citations
15.
Dopkins, Stephen, Richard Kovner, & Erich Goldmeier. (1994). Frequency Judgments for Semantic Categories in Amnesics and Normal Controls. Cortex. 30(1). 127–134. 4 indexed citations
16.
Dopkins, Stephen, et al.. (1993). Connecting goals and actions during reading.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition. 19(5). 1053–1060. 51 indexed citations
17.
Dopkins, Stephen, Celia M. Klin, & Jerome L. Myers. (1993). Accessibility of information about goals during the processing of narrative texts.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition. 19(1). 70–80. 29 indexed citations
18.
Dopkins, Stephen, et al.. (1990). Acquisition of a New Color Name in Amnesics and Normal Controls. Cortex. 26(2). 189–200. 13 indexed citations
19.
Dopkins, Stephen. (1988). Patterns of cognitive distance in narrative text representations. University Microfilms International eBooks.
20.
Kovner, Richard, Stephen Dopkins, & Erich Goldmeier. (1988). Effects of Instructional Set on Amnesic Recognition Memory Performance. Cortex. 24(3). 477–483. 19 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Buddhika Bellana Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jennifer Legault Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by M. Helen Southwood Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Maria Montefinese Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Terry Halwes Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Michael D. Anes Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Janet I. Vousden Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Denise H. Wu Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Dianne Bradley Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jeffrey Coney
Rankless by CCL
2026