Johan Brännmark

405 citations
32 papers · 126 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Johan Brännmark

27 papers receiving 115 citations

Peers

Johan Brännmark
Comparison fields: 5 of 42
  • Philosophy 46
  • Political Science and International Relations 38
  • History and Philosophy of Science 6
  • Applied Psychology 6
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 24
Replace Luke Gormally with:
Luke Gormally United Kingdom
Dan Moller United States
Remy Debes United States
Alexander Sarch United Kingdom
Jeremy Wanderer South Africa
Matthew C. Altman United States
Christopher Bobonich United States
Steven G. Gey United States
Christie Hartley United States
Anita M. Superson United States
Johan Brännmark relative to Luke Gormally United Kingdom Luke Gormally's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Luke Gormally · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Johan Brännmark

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Johan Brännmark's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Johan Brännmark with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Johan Brännmark more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Johan Brännmark

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Johan Brännmark. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Johan Brännmark. The network helps show where Johan Brännmark may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 2 scholars most cited alongside Johan Brännmark, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Johan Brännmark Line = papers co-authored together Johan Brännmark links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
GOOD LIVES: PARTS AND WHOLES
200111
2 201710
3 201910
4 200310
5 201010
6 20189
7 20159
8 20067
9 20067
10 20157
11 20205
12 20184
13 20084
14 20173
15 20083
16 20093
17 20182
18 20182
19
How can we be moral when we are so irrational?
20081
20 20231

About Johan Brännmark

Johan Brännmark is a scholar working on Philosophy, Political Science and International Relations, General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 32 papers that have together received 126 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophical Ethics and Theory (10 papers), Ethics in medical practice (9 papers), Political Philosophy and Ethics (9 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (4 papers), Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education (3 papers), Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare (3 papers), Patient Dignity and Privacy (3 papers) and Free Will and Agency (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (46 citations), Political Science and International Relations (38 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (6 citations), Applied Psychology (6 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (24 citations). Johan Brännmark has collaborated with scholars based in Sweden, Kenya and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Nils‐Eric Sahlin and Magnus Dustler. Their work appears in journals such as Theoria, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, Philosophical Studies, Journal of Risk Research and Philosophy of the Social Sciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact