Natalie R. Langley
- Archeology top 1%
- Surgery
- Genetics
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Co-authors
- Richard L. JantzDavid P. SeamansMolly B. KrausMonica W. HarbellVeerandra KoyyalamudiLee Meadows JantzStephen D. OusleyHeli Maijanen
- Topics
- Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies (16 papers)Forensic and Genetic Research (7 papers)Anesthesia and Pain Management (5 papers)
- Journals
- Forensic Science InternationalJournal of Forensic SciencesRegional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine
- Partner nations
- United StatesFinlandMalta
In The Last Decade
Natalie R. Langley
37 papers receiving 494 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
- Archeology 285
- Surgery 142
- Genetics 117
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 107
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 59
Countries citing papers authored by Natalie R. Langley
This map shows the geographic impact of Natalie R. Langley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natalie R. Langley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natalie R. Langley more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Natalie R. Langley
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natalie R. Langley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natalie R. Langley. The network helps show where Natalie R. Langley may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Natalie R. Langley
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Natalie R. Langley. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Natalie R. Langley based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Natalie R. Langley. Natalie R. Langley is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 6 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | Exploring Educational Needs beyond Technical Competency: Laboratory Management, Court Testimony, and Vicarious Trauma | 2 |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 47 | |
| 11 | 6 | |
| 12 | 27 | |
| 13 | 13 | |
| 14 | 2 | |
| 15 | 2 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 32 | |
| 18 | 17 | |
| 19 | 111 | |
| 20 | 10 |
About Natalie R. Langley
Natalie R. Langley is a scholar working on Archeology, Equine and Family Practice, having authored 38 papers that have together received 511 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies (16 papers), Forensic and Genetic Research (7 papers) and Anesthesia and Pain Management (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Archeology (285 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (29 citations) and Equine (8 citations). Natalie R. Langley has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Finland and Malta. Frequent co-authors include Richard L. Jantz, David P. Seamans, Molly B. Kraus, Monica W. Harbell, Veerandra Koyyalamudi, Lee Meadows Jantz, Stephen D. Ousley, Heli Maijanen, Jennifer S. Love and Mohamed R. Mahfouz. Their work appears in journals such as Forensic Science International, Journal of Forensic Sciences and Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.