Stephen Cox

1.2k citations
51 papers · 761 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Stephen Cox

41 papers receiving 691 citations

Peers

Stephen Cox
Comparison fields: 5 of 121
  • Applied Psychology 76
  • Sociology and Political Science 394
  • Social Psychology 160
  • Urban Studies 43
  • Gender Studies 59
Replace Ryan J. Orr with:
Ryan J. Orr United States
Anna Paola Ercolani Italy
Stefan Rädiker Germany
Els Rommes Netherlands
Christine Horne United States
Beth Ann Walker United States
Aaron Tkaczynski Australia
Maree Thyne New Zealand
Jennifer Paff Ogle United States
Pete Lunn Ireland
Stephen Cox relative to Ryan J. Orr United States Ryan J. Orr's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.5×
Ryan J. Orr · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Cox

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Cox's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Cox with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Cox more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Cox

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Cox. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Cox. The network helps show where Stephen Cox may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Cox, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen Cox Line = papers co-authored together Stephen Cox links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 51 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010196
2 1996132
3 201258
4 201541
5 201727
6 202227
7 201824
8 201322
9 202119
10 202218
11 201016
12 201916
13 202116
14 201416
15 202013
16
Brisbane's Creative Industries 2003
200312
17 201812
18 201411
19 201111
20
"The stranger within thee" : concepts of the self in late-eighteenth-century literature
198010

About Stephen Cox

Stephen Cox is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Strategy and Management, Clinical Psychology, Education and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, having authored 51 papers that have together received 761 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Family Support in Illness (7 papers), Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (6 papers), Innovation and Knowledge Management (6 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (5 papers), Cultural Industries and Urban Development (4 papers), Mining and Resource Management (4 papers), Management and Organizational Studies (3 papers) and Open Source Software Innovations (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (76 citations), Sociology and Political Science (394 citations), Social Psychology (160 citations), Urban Studies (43 citations) and Gender Studies (59 citations). Stephen Cox has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Katherine M. White, Cindy Gallois, Rachel Parker, Shari P. Walsh, Ross McD. Young, Kenneth I. Pakenham, Paul Thompson, Kyra Hamilton, Jan Henrik Gruenhagen and Alice Strazzabosco. Their work appears in journals such as Psychology and Health, Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, Resources Policy, Regional Studies and European Management Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact