Rachel Parker

1.7k total citations
63 papers, 1.1k citations indexed

About

Rachel Parker is a scholar working on Strategy and Management, Economics and Econometrics and Management of Technology and Innovation. According to data from OpenAlex, Rachel Parker has authored 63 papers receiving a total of 1.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 15 papers in Strategy and Management, 15 papers in Economics and Econometrics and 13 papers in Management of Technology and Innovation. Recurrent topics in Rachel Parker's work include Innovation and Knowledge Management (13 papers), Public Policy and Administration Research (7 papers) and Cultural Industries and Urban Development (7 papers). Rachel Parker is often cited by papers focused on Innovation and Knowledge Management (13 papers), Public Policy and Administration Research (7 papers) and Cultural Industries and Urban Development (7 papers). Rachel Parker collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Rachel Parker's co-authors include Lisa Bradley, Stephen Cox, Jan Henrik Gruenhagen, Richard P. Appelbaum, Paul Thompson, Damian Hine, Kerry Brown, Neal Ryan, Cong Cao and Yasuyuki Motoyama and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Journal of Business Research and Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice.

In The Last Decade

Rachel Parker

61 papers receiving 971 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Rachel Parker Australia 18 280 205 204 195 159 63 1.1k
Gordon Kingsley United States 12 324 1.2× 239 1.2× 204 1.0× 197 1.0× 263 1.7× 44 997
Ian McLoughlin United Kingdom 20 265 0.9× 331 1.6× 203 1.0× 78 0.4× 126 0.8× 72 1.1k
Gordon Müller‐Seitz Germany 19 450 1.6× 280 1.4× 238 1.2× 90 0.5× 63 0.4× 63 1.1k
P. Devereaux Jennings Canada 9 269 1.0× 240 1.2× 243 1.2× 112 0.6× 43 0.3× 26 994
Sandy Qu Canada 8 259 0.9× 237 1.2× 247 1.2× 67 0.3× 74 0.5× 17 1.3k
Graham Francis United Kingdom 23 561 2.0× 104 0.5× 191 0.9× 180 0.9× 114 0.7× 54 1.6k
Carmine Bianchi Italy 19 417 1.5× 124 0.6× 80 0.4× 107 0.5× 185 1.2× 65 1.0k
Ricardo Corrêa Gomes Brazil 17 254 0.9× 174 0.8× 67 0.3× 149 0.8× 194 1.2× 98 920
Kevan Scholes United Kingdom 10 468 1.7× 92 0.4× 231 1.1× 124 0.6× 41 0.3× 12 1.1k
Hartmut Hirsch‐Kreinsen Germany 14 381 1.4× 229 1.1× 73 0.4× 325 1.7× 29 0.2× 75 1.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Rachel Parker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rachel Parker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rachel Parker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rachel Parker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Rachel Parker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rachel Parker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rachel Parker. The network helps show where Rachel Parker may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rachel Parker

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rachel Parker. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rachel Parker based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Rachel Parker. Rachel Parker is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Parker, Rachel & David Hodgson. (2020). 'One size does not fit all': Engaging students who have experienced trauma. Issues in educational research. 30(1). 245–259. 8 indexed citations
2.
Cox, Stephen, Rachel Parker, Ian M. O’Hara, & Stephen Sinclair. (2020). Coordination and legitimacy in the Australian biofuels innovation system 1979 - 2017. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions. 38. 54–67. 4 indexed citations
4.
Foladori, Guillermo, et al.. (2017). La política pública de nanotecnología en México. Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja). 12(34). 51–64. 2 indexed citations
5.
Parker, Rachel, Stephen Cox, & Paul Thompson. (2017). Financialization and Value-based Control: Lessons from the Australian Mining Supply Chain. Economic Geography. 94(1). 49–67. 27 indexed citations
6.
Verreynne, Martie‐Louise, et al.. (2016). Building a scale for dynamic learning capabilities: The role of resources, learning, competitive intent and routine patterning. Journal of Business Research. 69(10). 4287–4303. 29 indexed citations
7.
Sergi, Brian, et al.. (2014). Support for International Collaboration in Research: The Role of the Overseas Offices of Basic Science Funders. Review of Policy Research. 31(5). 430–453. 7 indexed citations
8.
Parker, Rachel & Damian Hine. (2013). Enterprise Policy and the Metagovernance of Firm Capabilities. Administration & Society. 47(6). 656–679. 3 indexed citations
9.
Parker, Rachel & Damian Hine. (2013). The Role of Knowledge Intermediaries in Developing Firm Learning Capabilities. European Planning Studies. 22(5). 1048–1061. 22 indexed citations
10.
Foladori, Guillermo, et al.. (2012). Mexico-U.S. Scientific Collaboration in Nanotechnology. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 2 indexed citations
11.
Frederick, Stacey, et al.. (2011). Traveling Technologies: Societal Implications of Nanotechnology Through the Global Value Chain. 3(1). 36–44. 3 indexed citations
12.
Yiğitcanlar, Tan, et al.. (2010). Towards a unified method for the knowledge based urban development framework. QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology). 2 indexed citations
13.
Parker, Rachel, et al.. (2009). Developing capabilities for ongoing learning and change in intermediary programs. QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology). 1 indexed citations
14.
Boreham, Paul, et al.. (2007). New Technology @ Work. Queensland's institutional digital repository (The University of Queensland). 9 indexed citations
15.
Bradley, Lisa & Rachel Parker. (2006). Do Australian public sector employees have the type of culture they want in the era of new public management?. Australian Journal of Public Administration. 65(1). 89–99. 24 indexed citations
16.
Parker, Rachel. (2002). Coordination and Competition in Small Business Policy: A Comparative Analysis of Australia and Denmark. Journal of Economic Issues. 36(4). 935–952. 9 indexed citations
17.
Bradley, Lisa & Rachel Parker. (2001). Public Sector Change in Australia: Are Managers' Ideals Being Realized?. Public Personnel Management. 30(3). 349–361. 17 indexed citations
18.
Parker, Rachel, Neal Ryan, & Kerry Brown. (2000). Drivers and Outcomes of the New Public Management in Three Public Sector Agencies. QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology). 6(2). 5–14. 6 indexed citations
19.
Brown, Kerry, Neal Ryan, & Rachel Parker. (2000). New Modes of Service Delivery in the Public Sector. International Journal of Public Sector Management. 7 indexed citations
20.
Parker, Rachel. (1999). From National Champions to Small and Medium Sized Enterprises: Changing Policy Emphasis in France, Germany and Sweden. Journal of Public Policy. 19(1). 63–89. 18 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026