Resources Policy

5.4k papers and 135.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 5.4k papers published in Resources Policy in the last decades have received a total of 135.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Resources Policy usually cover Economics and Econometrics (3.0k papers), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (1.6k papers) and Building and Construction (1.4k papers) specifically the topics of Energy, Environment, Economic Growth (2.1k papers), Mining and Resource Management (1.4k papers) and Market Dynamics and Volatility (1.3k papers). The most active scholars publishing in Resources Policy are Graham A. Davis, Gavin Hilson, John E. Tilton, Muhammad Shahbaz, Gavin M. Mudd, Jason Prno, Muhammad Umar, Xuan Vinh Vo, Oluwasegun B. Adekoya and Coby van der Linde.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Resources Policy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Resources Policy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Resources Policy.

Countries where authors publish in Resources Policy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Resources Policy. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Resources Policy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Resources Policy more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025