Stephen Chapman

63 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Stephen Chapman
Comparison fields: 5 of 155
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 84
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 34
  • Gastroenterology 91
  • Family Practice 32
  • Economics and Econometrics 287
Replace Robert Hayward with:
Robert Hayward United States
Hong Xiao China
Vikram Kilambi United States
JA Thompson United Kingdom
John Ryan United States
Julie J. Ruterbusch United States
Hans Ury United States
Xiaoying Yu United States
Nicoletta Erba Italy
Sharada Weir United States
Stephen Chapman relative to Robert Hayward United States Robert Hayward's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×13×
Robert Hayward · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Chapman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Chapman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Chapman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Chapman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Chapman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Chapman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Chapman. The network helps show where Stephen Chapman may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Chapman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen Chapman Line = papers co-authored together Stephen Chapman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 66 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1996195
2 1981184
3 1998118
4
Standards for radiological investigations of suspected non-accidental injury
200862
5 201247
6 202146
7 199646
8 201741
9 201741
10 201838
11 200338
12 201337
13 201836
14 200236
15 201330
16 201725
17 200124
18 201822
19 200122
20 201621

About Stephen Chapman

Stephen Chapman is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Economics and Econometrics, Physiology and Geriatrics and Gerontology, having authored 66 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovations in Medical Education (11 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (11 papers), Biosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods (8 papers), Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare (8 papers), Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (7 papers), Pharmaceutical studies and practices (6 papers), Healthcare cost, quality, practices (6 papers) and Health Sciences Research and Education (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (84 citations), Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (34 citations), Gastroenterology (91 citations), Family Practice (32 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (287 citations). Stephen Chapman has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Iraq. Frequent co-authors include R Fitzpatrick, J. M. Anderson, M. J. Swift, O. W. Heal, Elwyn Elias, Paul Emery, Andrew Gough, Simon White, Martin Frischer and Peter Croft. Their work appears in journals such as BMJ Open, JMIR Medical Education, BioDrugs, Journal of Public Health and International Journal of Pharmacy Practice.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact