Stephanie Tesson

26 papers receiving 670 citations

Peers

Stephanie Tesson
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • Oncology 347
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 177
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 174
  • General Health Professions 169
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 128
Replace W. Ivon Burns with:
W. Ivon Burns Australia
James MacDonald United States
Elisabeth Andritsch Austria
Sara Beattie Canada
Laura B. Oswald United States
Agneta Wennman‐Larsen Sweden
Andrea A. Cohee United States
Julie Walker United States
Ute Goerling Germany
Tenbroeck Smith United States
Stephanie Tesson relative to W. Ivon Burns Australia W. Ivon Burns's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×17.5×
W. Ivon Burns · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephanie Tesson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephanie Tesson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephanie Tesson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephanie Tesson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephanie Tesson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephanie Tesson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephanie Tesson. The network helps show where Stephanie Tesson may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stephanie Tesson

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stephanie Tesson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stephanie Tesson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stephanie Tesson. Stephanie Tesson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 0
2 12
3 9
4 23
5 4
6 35
7 30
8 53
9
ConquerFear for treating fear of cancer recurrence: Mediators and moderators of treatment efficacy
1
10 14
11 35
12 15
13
A Randomized Controlled Trial (Rct) of a Psychological Intervention (Conquer Fear) to Reduce Clinical Levels of Fear of Cancer Recurrence in Breast, Colorectal and Melanoma Cancer Survivors
3
14 10
15 3
16 11
17 97
18 1
19 91
20 5

About Stephanie Tesson

Stephanie Tesson is a scholar working on Medical Terminology, Oncology and Applied Psychology, having authored 27 papers that have together received 682 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cancer survivorship and care (10 papers), BRCA gene mutations in cancer (6 papers) and Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Medical Terminology (16 citations), Oncology (347 citations) and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (177 citations). Stephanie Tesson has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Phyllis Butow, Frances Boyle, Nicholas Zdenkowski, Nadine A. Kasparian, Louise Sharpe, Daniel Costa, Jane Beith, Jemma Gilchrist, Belinda Thewes and Afaf Girgis. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics and Health Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026