Stephanie Smith

1.8k total citations
35 papers, 1.3k citations indexed

About

Stephanie Smith is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Genetics and Endocrinology. According to data from OpenAlex, Stephanie Smith has authored 35 papers receiving a total of 1.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 25 papers in Molecular Biology, 7 papers in Genetics and 7 papers in Endocrinology. Recurrent topics in Stephanie Smith's work include DNA Repair Mechanisms (15 papers), Vibrio bacteria research studies (7 papers) and CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (7 papers). Stephanie Smith is often cited by papers focused on DNA Repair Mechanisms (15 papers), Vibrio bacteria research studies (7 papers) and CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (7 papers). Stephanie Smith collaborates with scholars based in United States, Spain and Japan. Stephanie Smith's co-authors include Kyungjae Myung, Ji‐Young Hwang, Martin E. Budd, Judith L. Campbell, Soma Banerjee, Clara C. Reis, Alecia N. Septer, Amitabha Gupta, Lauren Speare and Richard D. Kolodner and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Nature Genetics and SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.

In The Last Decade

Stephanie Smith

33 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Stephanie Smith
Jeffrey Garnes United States
Tomoyasu Sugiyama United States
George R. Molloy United States
André P. Gerber Switzerland
Jason R. Kennerdell United States
Stephanie Smith
Citations per year, relative to Stephanie Smith Stephanie Smith (= 1×) peers Yuji Masuda

Countries citing papers authored by Stephanie Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephanie Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephanie Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephanie Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephanie Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephanie Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephanie Smith. The network helps show where Stephanie Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stephanie Smith

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stephanie Smith. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stephanie Smith based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stephanie Smith. Stephanie Smith is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Smith, Stephanie, et al.. (2023). A subcellular biochemical model for T6SS dynamics reveals winning competitive strategies. PNAS Nexus. 2(7). pgad195–pgad195. 6 indexed citations
2.
Borman, Pim, B. M. Cote, François Therriault‐Proulx, et al.. (2023). Performance characterization of a novel hybrid dosimetry insert for simultaneous spatial, temporal, and motion‐included dosimetry for MR‐linac. Medical Physics. 51(4). 2983–2997. 2 indexed citations
3.
Chandler, Randy J., Giovanni Di Pasquale, Eun-Young Choi, et al.. (2023). Systemic gene therapy using an AAV44.9 vector rescues a neonatal lethal mouse model of propionic acidemia. Molecular Therapy — Methods & Clinical Development. 30. 181–190. 1 indexed citations
4.
Gómez‐Consarnau, Laura, Stephanie Smith, Oscar Schofield, et al.. (2023). Widespread use of proton-pumping rhodopsin in Antarctic phytoplankton. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 120(39). e2307638120–e2307638120. 14 indexed citations
5.
Suria, Andrea M., et al.. (2022). Prevalence and diversity of type VI secretion systems in a model beneficial symbiosis. Frontiers in Microbiology. 13. 988044–988044. 10 indexed citations
6.
Smith, Stephanie & Alecia N. Septer. (2021). Quantification of Interbacterial Competition using Single-Cell Fluorescence Imaging. Journal of Visualized Experiments. 3 indexed citations
7.
Ferla, Rita, Edoardo Nusco, John M. Cullen, et al.. (2020). Low incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma in mice and cats treated with systemic adeno-associated viral vectors. Molecular Therapy — Methods & Clinical Development. 20. 247–257. 35 indexed citations
8.
Li, Yedda, Christopher A. Miller, Lauren Shea, et al.. (2020). Enhanced Efficacy and Increased Long-Term Toxicity of CNS-Directed, AAV-Based Combination Therapy for Krabbe Disease. Molecular Therapy. 29(2). 691–701. 33 indexed citations
9.
Gjorgjieva, Monika, Stephanie Smith, Elizabeth D. Brooks, et al.. (2019). Pathogenesis of Hepatic Tumors following Gene Therapy in Murine and Canine Models of Glycogen Storage Disease. Molecular Therapy — Methods & Clinical Development. 15. 383–391. 13 indexed citations
10.
Speare, Lauren, Kirsten R. Guckes, Stephanie Smith, et al.. (2018). Bacterial symbionts use a type VI secretion system to eliminate competitors in their natural host. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 115(36). E8528–E8537. 134 indexed citations
11.
Smith, Stephanie, et al.. (2015). Hyper-Acetylation of Histone H3K56 Limits Break-Induced Replication by Inhibiting Extensive Repair Synthesis. PLoS Genetics. 11(2). e1004990–e1004990. 29 indexed citations
12.
Smith, Stephanie, Jennifer T. Fox, Alihossein Saberi, et al.. (2014). Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors Selectively Target Homology Dependent DNA Repair Defective Cells and Elevate Non-Homologous Endjoining Activity. PLoS ONE. 9(1). e87203–e87203. 17 indexed citations
13.
Becker, Jordan R., Yee Mon Thu, Michael Costanzo, et al.. (2013). Unligated Okazaki Fragments Induce PCNA Ubiquitination and a Requirement for Rad59-Dependent Replication Fork Progression. PLoS ONE. 8(6). e66379–e66379. 21 indexed citations
14.
Stirling, Peter C., Michelle S. Bloom, Stephanie Smith, et al.. (2011). The Complete Spectrum of Yeast Chromosome Instability Genes Identifies Candidate CIN Cancer Genes and Functional Roles for ASTRA Complex Components. PLoS Genetics. 7(4). e1002057–e1002057. 128 indexed citations
15.
Sikdar, Nilabja, Soma Banerjee, Han Zhang, Stephanie Smith, & Kyungjae Myung. (2008). Spt2p Defines a New Transcription-Dependent Gross Chromosomal Rearrangement Pathway. PLoS Genetics. 4(12). e1000290–e1000290. 20 indexed citations
16.
Myung, Kyungjae & Stephanie Smith. (2008). The RAD5-dependent Postreplication Repair Pathway is Important to Suppress Gross Chromosomal Rearrangements. JNCI Monographs. 2008(39). 12–15. 6 indexed citations
17.
Hwang, Ji‐Young, et al.. (2008). Smc5–Smc6 complex suppresses gross chromosomal rearrangements mediated by break-induced replications. DNA repair. 7(9). 1426–1436. 28 indexed citations
18.
Smith, Stephanie, Amitabha Gupta, Richard D. Kolodner, & Kyungjae Myung. (2005). Suppression of gross chromosomal rearrangements by the multiple functions of the Mre11–Rad50–Xrs2 complex in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. DNA repair. 4(5). 606–617. 27 indexed citations
19.
Hwang, Ji‐Young, Stephanie Smith, & Kyungjae Myung. (2005). The Rad1-Rad10 Complex Promotes the Production of Gross Chromosomal Rearrangements From Spontaneous DNA Damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 169(4). 1927–1937. 25 indexed citations
20.
Jin, Hongjian, Melanie May, Lisbeth Tranebjærg, et al.. (1996). A novel X–linked gene, DDP, shows mutations in families with deafness (DFN–1), dystonia, mental deficiency and blindness. Nature Genetics. 14(2). 177–180. 199 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026