Stephanie Ming Young

1.2k citations
55 papers · 680 indexed · h-index 16

Stephanie Ming Young

52 papers receiving 674 citations

Peers

Stephanie Ming Young
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Ophthalmology 256
  • Dermatology 118
  • Neurology 179
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 133
  • Oral Surgery 51
Replace Christoph Hintschich with:
Christoph Hintschich Germany
Gangadhara Sundar Singapore
Yoon‐Duck Kim South Korea
Pete Setabutr United States
Ioannis Mavrikakis United Kingdom
Brett O’Donnell Australia
John D. Ng United States
Thomas G. Hardy Australia
William R. Nunery United States
Ilse Mombaerts Belgium
Stephanie Ming Young relative to Christoph Hintschich Germany Christoph Hintschich's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Christoph Hintschich · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephanie Ming Young

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephanie Ming Young's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephanie Ming Young with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephanie Ming Young more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephanie Ming Young

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephanie Ming Young. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephanie Ming Young. The network helps show where Stephanie Ming Young may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephanie Ming Young, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephanie Ming Young Line = papers co-authored together Stephanie Ming Young links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20250
2 202315
3 20230
4 20231
5 202210
6 202023
7 20203
8 202011
9 20199
10 201827
11 201810
12 201813
13 20185
14 201636
15
A retrospective analysis of the natural history and management of serpiginous choroidopathy (SC) in Australia and New Zealand
20131
16 20138
17 201221
18 200938
19 200833
20 19914

About Stephanie Ming Young

Stephanie Ming Young is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Dermatology and Neurology, having authored 55 papers that have together received 680 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders (13 papers), Facial Trauma and Fracture Management (11 papers), Facial Rejuvenation and Surgery Techniques (9 papers), Traumatic Ocular and Foreign Body Injuries (9 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (7 papers), Meningioma and schwannoma management (5 papers), Facial Nerve Paralysis Treatment and Research (5 papers) and Head and Neck Surgical Oncology (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (256 citations), Dermatology (118 citations) and Neurology (179 citations). Stephanie Ming Young has collaborated with scholars based in Singapore, South Korea and United States. Frequent co-authors include Yoon‐Duck Kim, Kyung In Woo, Stephanie S. Lang, Gangadhara Sundar, Shantha Amrith, Anna Marie Tan, Thiam‐Chye Lim, Shruthi Tara, Paul Chew and Jovina See. Their work appears in journals such as Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, British Journal of Ophthalmology, Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science and Ophthalmology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026