Pete Setabutr

1.0k total citations
57 papers, 677 citations indexed

About

Pete Setabutr is a scholar working on Surgery, Dermatology and Ophthalmology. According to data from OpenAlex, Pete Setabutr has authored 57 papers receiving a total of 677 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 22 papers in Surgery, 13 papers in Dermatology and 13 papers in Ophthalmology. Recurrent topics in Pete Setabutr's work include Facial Rejuvenation and Surgery Techniques (9 papers), Facial Trauma and Fracture Management (8 papers) and Soft tissue tumor case studies (7 papers). Pete Setabutr is often cited by papers focused on Facial Rejuvenation and Surgery Techniques (9 papers), Facial Trauma and Fracture Management (8 papers) and Soft tissue tumor case studies (7 papers). Pete Setabutr collaborates with scholars based in United States, Brazil and Israel. Pete Setabutr's co-authors include Vinay K. Aakalu, Ali R. Sepahdari, Mahmood F. Mafee, Masoud Shiehmorteza, A. M. Putterman, John Naheedy, Ramesh M. Singa, Rakesh M. Patel, Allen M. Putterman and Michael Andreoli and has published in prestigious journals such as Radiology, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science and American Journal of Neuroradiology.

In The Last Decade

Pete Setabutr

51 papers receiving 648 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Pete Setabutr United States 13 220 197 181 139 136 57 677
Ioannis Mavrikakis United Kingdom 17 171 0.8× 231 1.2× 169 0.9× 208 1.5× 354 2.6× 36 887
O. Galatoire France 13 118 0.5× 121 0.6× 193 1.1× 121 0.9× 87 0.6× 50 526
John D. Ng United States 14 98 0.4× 95 0.5× 220 1.2× 71 0.5× 164 1.2× 55 532
Rona Z. Silkiss United States 18 238 1.1× 192 1.0× 128 0.7× 57 0.4× 225 1.7× 57 728
Stephanie Ming Young Singapore 16 118 0.5× 179 0.9× 277 1.5× 36 0.3× 256 1.9× 55 680
Shantha Amrith Singapore 17 177 0.8× 131 0.7× 324 1.8× 38 0.3× 327 2.4× 42 740
Norman C. Charles United States 14 74 0.3× 166 0.8× 130 0.7× 134 1.0× 228 1.7× 68 661
Steven C. Dresner United States 15 423 1.9× 174 0.9× 374 2.1× 167 1.2× 233 1.7× 28 906
Geva Mannor United States 14 325 1.5× 94 0.5× 326 1.8× 99 0.7× 407 3.0× 34 762
Francis C. Sutula United States 15 202 0.9× 122 0.6× 425 2.3× 57 0.4× 214 1.6× 34 720

Countries citing papers authored by Pete Setabutr

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Pete Setabutr's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Pete Setabutr with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pete Setabutr more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Pete Setabutr

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Pete Setabutr. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Pete Setabutr. The network helps show where Pete Setabutr may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Pete Setabutr

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Pete Setabutr. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Pete Setabutr based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Pete Setabutr. Pete Setabutr is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Nahass, George R., et al.. (2025). Open-Source Periorbital Segmentation Dataset for Ophthalmic Applications. Ophthalmology Science. 5(4). 100757–100757.
2.
Imayama, Ikuyo, et al.. (2023). Use of a nasolacrimal stent to treat air regurgitation after dacryocystorhinostomy in a patient using a continuous positive airway pressure device. Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine. 19(12). 2123–2124. 1 indexed citations
3.
Oh, Daniel J., et al.. (2020). Scleral lens for severe dry eye status post lacrimal gland resection for adenoid cystic carcinoma. American Journal of Ophthalmology Case Reports. 17. 100601–100601. 4 indexed citations
4.
Setabutr, Pete, et al.. (2018). Self-Adhering Magnetic Device to Treat Corneal Exposure. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 59(9). 98–98. 1 indexed citations
5.
Liu, Catherine Y., Priyanka Chhadva, & Pete Setabutr. (2018). Blepharoptosis repair. Current Opinion in Otolaryngology & Head & Neck Surgery. 26(4). 221–226. 7 indexed citations
6.
Mettu, Pradeep, M. Tariq Bhatti, Mays El-Dairi, et al.. (2016). Orbito-Masticatory Syndrome. Journal of Neuro-Ophthalmology. 36(3). 308–312.
7.
Farooq, Asim V., et al.. (2015). Fungal Orbital Cellulitis: Presenting Features, Management and Outcomes at a Referral Center. Orbit. 34(3). 152–159. 26 indexed citations
8.
Lin, Amy, et al.. (2014). A Tissue Microarray Analysis of Stem cell markers positive cells in Human Accessory Lacrimal Glands (ALG) from Muller Muscle Conjunctival Resection (MMCR) Specimens.. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 55(13). 3116–3116. 1 indexed citations
9.
Patel, Rakesh M., Ziad A. Hage, Samuel Lee, et al.. (2014). Cerebrospinal Fluid Leak Presenting as Epiphora. Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 32(2). e26–e28. 2 indexed citations
10.
Aakalu, Vinay K., et al.. (2014). Orbital Histiocytic Sarcoma in a 2-Year-Old Child. Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 30(6). e143–e145. 5 indexed citations
11.
Hou, Joshua H., et al.. (2013). Relative Incidence of Blepharoptosis Subtypes in an Oculoplastics Practice at a Tertiary Care Center. Orbit. 32(4). 231–234. 42 indexed citations
12.
Alaraj, Ali, et al.. (2013). Endovascular Preoperative Embolization of Orbital Hemangiopericytoma With n-Butyl Cyanoacrylate Glue. Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 30(4). e97–e100. 14 indexed citations
13.
14.
Singa, Ramesh M., et al.. (2012). Evisceration and Enucleation: A National Survey of Practice Patterns in the United States. Ophthalmic surgery, lasers & imaging retina. 43(5). 425–430. 28 indexed citations
15.
Cruz, José de la, Maria S. Cortina, Anna S. Kitzmann, et al.. (2012). Eyelid Procedures in Patients Who Have Undergone Boston Keratoprosthesis Surgery. Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 28(4). 286–288. 7 indexed citations
16.
Aakalu, Vinay K. & Pete Setabutr. (2011). Current Ptosis Management: A National Survey of ASOPRS Members. Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 27(4). 270–276. 60 indexed citations
17.
Aakalu, Vinay K., et al.. (2010). A Clinicopathological Correlation Between Müller's Muscle-Conjunctival Resection and Corneal Staining Pattern. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 51(13). 1472–1472. 1 indexed citations
18.
Marcet, Marcus M., Pete Setabutr, Bradley N. Lemke, et al.. (2010). Surgical Microanatomy of the Müller Muscle-Conjunctival Resection Ptosis Procedure. Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 26(5). 360–364. 45 indexed citations
19.
Chow, Clement C., R. L. Kapur, Michael G. Wood, Pete Setabutr, & Elmer Y. Tu. (2009). Septo-optic dysplasia with bilateral congenital corneal anesthesia. Journal of American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus. 13(5). 494–495. 1 indexed citations
20.
Sepahdari, Ali R., et al.. (2008). MR Imaging of Orbital Inflammatory Syndrome, Orbital Cellulitis, and Orbital Lymphoid Lesions: The Role of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging. American Journal of Neuroradiology. 30(1). 64–70. 116 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026