Pete Setabutr
- Dermatology top 2%
- Neurology top 5%
- Surgery
- Rheumatology top 10%
- Ophthalmology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Vinay K. AakaluAli R. SepahdariMahmood F. MafeeMasoud ShiehmortezaA. M. PuttermanJohn NaheedyRamesh M. SingaRakesh M. Patel
- Topics
- Facial Rejuvenation and Surgery Techniques (9 papers)Facial Trauma and Fracture Management (8 papers)Soft tissue tumor case studies (7 papers)
- Cited by
- DermatologyOphthalmologyNeurology
- Partner nations
- United StatesBrazilIsrael
In The Last Decade
Pete Setabutr
51 papers receiving 648 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
- Dermatology 220
- Neurology 197
- Surgery 181
- Rheumatology 139
- Ophthalmology 136
Countries citing papers authored by Pete Setabutr
This map shows the geographic impact of Pete Setabutr's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Pete Setabutr with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pete Setabutr more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Pete Setabutr
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Pete Setabutr. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Pete Setabutr. The network helps show where Pete Setabutr may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Pete Setabutr
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Pete Setabutr. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Pete Setabutr based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Pete Setabutr. Pete Setabutr is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | Self-Adhering Magnetic Device to Treat Corneal Exposure | 1 |
| 5 | 7 | |
| 6 | 0 | |
| 7 | 26 | |
| 8 | A Tissue Microarray Analysis of Stem cell markers positive cells in Human Accessory Lacrimal Glands (ALG) from Muller Muscle Conjunctival Resection (MMCR) Specimens. | 1 |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 10 | 5 | |
| 11 | 42 | |
| 12 | 14 | |
| 13 | 2 | |
| 14 | 28 | |
| 15 | 7 | |
| 16 | 60 | |
| 17 | A Clinicopathological Correlation Between Müller's Muscle-Conjunctival Resection and Corneal Staining Pattern | 1 |
| 18 | 45 | |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | 116 |
About Pete Setabutr
Pete Setabutr is a scholar working on Dermatology, Ophthalmology and Oral Surgery, having authored 57 papers that have together received 677 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Facial Rejuvenation and Surgery Techniques (9 papers), Facial Trauma and Fracture Management (8 papers) and Soft tissue tumor case studies (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Dermatology (220 citations), Ophthalmology (136 citations) and Neurology (197 citations). Pete Setabutr has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Brazil and Israel. Frequent co-authors include Vinay K. Aakalu, Ali R. Sepahdari, Mahmood F. Mafee, Masoud Shiehmorteza, A. M. Putterman, John Naheedy, Ramesh M. Singa, Rakesh M. Patel, Allen M. Putterman and Michael Andreoli. Their work appears in journals such as Radiology, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science and American Journal of Neuroradiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.