Stephanie Gogel

579 total citations
10 papers, 424 citations indexed

About

Stephanie Gogel is a scholar working on Sensory Systems, Cognitive Neuroscience and Neurology. According to data from OpenAlex, Stephanie Gogel has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 424 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Sensory Systems, 9 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 5 papers in Neurology. Recurrent topics in Stephanie Gogel's work include Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (10 papers), Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (9 papers) and Vestibular and auditory disorders (5 papers). Stephanie Gogel is often cited by papers focused on Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (10 papers), Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (9 papers) and Vestibular and auditory disorders (5 papers). Stephanie Gogel collaborates with scholars based in United States, China and Australia. Stephanie Gogel's co-authors include Richard S. Tyler, Anne K. Gehringer, Tao Pan, Haihong Ji, Claudia Coelho, Cláudia Coelho, William Noble, Jay T. Rubinstein, Camille C. Dunn and Bruce J. Gantz and has published in prestigious journals such as Progress in brain research, Otology & Neurotology and International Journal of Audiology.

In The Last Decade

Stephanie Gogel

10 papers receiving 410 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Stephanie Gogel United States	9	403	353	235	88	36	10	424
Anne K. Gehringer United States	7	377 0.9×	330 0.9×	227 1.0×	78 0.9×	29 0.8×	7	392
Annette Hurley United States	10	464 1.2×	501 1.4×	222 0.9×	122 1.4×	50 1.4×	18	584
Cláudia Coelho United States	7	313 0.8×	250 0.7×	207 0.9×	48 0.5×	19 0.5×	9	352
Luca Del Bo Italy	14	477 1.2×	435 1.2×	273 1.2×	118 1.3×	36 1.0×	24	558
Michele Vargas Garcia Brazil	12	209 0.5×	243 0.7×	80 0.3×	66 0.8×	37 1.0×	79	375
Ann Perreau United States	12	375 0.9×	477 1.4×	125 0.5×	251 2.9×	33 0.9×	26	518
Jiunn-Liang Wu Taiwan	11	221 0.5×	253 0.7×	75 0.3×	125 1.4×	41 1.1×	22	398
R. Patrick Cecola United States	4	351 0.9×	318 0.9×	213 0.9×	79 0.9×	20 0.6×	5	368
Andrea Kleine Punte Belgium	16	612 1.5×	720 2.0×	160 0.7×	299 3.4×	110 3.1×	22	764
Elyse Jameyson United States	7	209 0.5×	309 0.9×	114 0.5×	157 1.8×	24 0.7×	8	376

Countries citing papers authored by Stephanie Gogel

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephanie Gogel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephanie Gogel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephanie Gogel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephanie Gogel

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephanie Gogel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephanie Gogel. The network helps show where Stephanie Gogel may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stephanie Gogel

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stephanie Gogel. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stephanie Gogel based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stephanie Gogel. Stephanie Gogel is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

10 of 10 papers shown

1.

Dunn, Camille C., et al.. (2019). Bilateral Cochlear Implants Using Two Electrode Lengths in Infants With Profound Deafness. Otology & Neurotology. 40(3). e267–e276. 1 indexed citations

2.

Gantz, Bruce J., et al.. (2016). Outcomes of Adolescents With a Short Electrode Cochlear Implant With Preserved Residual Hearing. Otology & Neurotology. 37(2). e118–e125. 16 indexed citations

3.

Pan, Tao, Richard S. Tyler, Haihong Ji, Cláudia Coelho, & Stephanie Gogel. (2015). Differences Among Patients That Make Their Tinnitus Worse or Better. American Journal of Audiology. 24(4). 469–476. 15 indexed citations

4.

Pan, Tao, Richard S. Tyler, Haihong Ji, et al.. (2009). The relationship between tinnitus pitch and the audiogram. International Journal of Audiology. 48(5). 277–294. 81 indexed citations

5.

Pan, Tao, Richard S. Tyler, Haihong Ji, et al.. (2009). Changes in the Tinnitus Handicap Questionnaire After Cochlear Implantation. American Journal of Audiology. 18(2). 144–151. 74 indexed citations

6.

Tyler, Richard S., et al.. (2008). Establishing a Tinnitus Clinic in Your Practice. American Journal of Audiology. 17(1). 25–37. 27 indexed citations

7.

Tyler, Richard S., Jay T. Rubinstein, Tao Pan, et al.. (2008). Electrical Stimulation of the Cochlea to Reduce Tinnitus. Seminars in Hearing. 29(4). 326–332. 46 indexed citations

8.

Tyler, Richard S., Cláudia Coelho, Tao Pan, et al.. (2008). Identifying Tinnitus Subgroups With Cluster Analysis. American Journal of Audiology. 17(2). S176–84. 84 indexed citations

9.

Tyler, Richard S., et al.. (2008). Tinnitus: How you can help yourself!. Audiological Medicine. 6(1). 85–91. 12 indexed citations

10.

Tyler, Richard S., Stephanie Gogel, & Anne K. Gehringer. (2007). Tinnitus activities treatment. Progress in brain research. 166. 425–434. 68 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact