Cláudia Coelho

730 total citations
9 papers, 352 citations indexed

About

Cláudia Coelho is a scholar working on Sensory Systems, Cognitive Neuroscience and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Cláudia Coelho has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 352 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Sensory Systems, 4 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 3 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Cláudia Coelho's work include Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (5 papers), Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (4 papers) and Vestibular and auditory disorders (3 papers). Cláudia Coelho is often cited by papers focused on Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (5 papers), Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (4 papers) and Vestibular and auditory disorders (3 papers). Cláudia Coelho collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Cláudia Coelho's co-authors include Richard S. Tyler, William Noble, Dirk De Ridder, Berthold Langguth, Ricardo Rodrigues Figueiredo, Haihong Ji, Tobias Kleinjung, Michael Koller, Florian Zeman and Michael Landgrebe and has published in prestigious journals such as Otolaryngology, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology and Discourse Studies.

In The Last Decade

Cláudia Coelho

8 papers receiving 342 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Cláudia Coelho United States	7	313	250	207	48	29	9	352
Susanne Staudinger Germany	6	264 0.8×	200 0.8×	211 1.0×	25 0.5×	27 0.9×	11	306
Jorge Simões Germany	8	239 0.8×	192 0.8×	175 0.8×	32 0.7×	37 1.3×	32	308
Harald Seidler Germany	9	195 0.6×	246 1.0×	118 0.6×	55 1.1×	36 1.2×	15	302
Danuta Raj-Koziak Poland	13	408 1.3×	369 1.5×	253 1.2×	84 1.8×	24 0.8×	50	495
Michele Vargas Garcia Brazil	12	209 0.7×	243 1.0×	80 0.4×	66 1.4×	48 1.7×	79	375
Jeanne A. Wharton United States	8	347 1.1×	334 1.3×	177 0.9×	56 1.2×	76 2.6×	11	401
Anne K. Gehringer United States	7	377 1.2×	330 1.3×	227 1.1×	78 1.6×	29 1.0×	7	392
Stephanie Gogel United States	9	403 1.3×	353 1.4×	235 1.1×	88 1.8×	31 1.1×	10	424
Ann Perreau United States	12	375 1.2×	477 1.9×	125 0.6×	251 5.2×	33 1.1×	26	518
Jian‐Ping Gu China	8	250 0.8×	269 1.1×	190 0.9×	12 0.3×	38 1.3×	11	344

Countries citing papers authored by Cláudia Coelho

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Cláudia Coelho's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cláudia Coelho with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cláudia Coelho more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Cláudia Coelho

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cláudia Coelho. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cláudia Coelho. The network helps show where Cláudia Coelho may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Cláudia Coelho

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Cláudia Coelho. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Cláudia Coelho based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Cláudia Coelho. Cláudia Coelho is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

1.

Tyler, Richard S., Haihong Ji, Cláudia Coelho, et al.. (2016). Manganese and Lipoflavonoid Plus^® to Treat Tinnitus: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology. 27(8). 661–668. 6 indexed citations

2.

Pan, Tao, Richard S. Tyler, Haihong Ji, Cláudia Coelho, & Stephanie Gogel. (2015). Differences Among Patients That Make Their Tinnitus Worse or Better. American Journal of Audiology. 24(4). 469–476. 15 indexed citations

3.

Zeman, Florian, Michael Koller, Ricardo Rodrigues Figueiredo, et al.. (2011). Tinnitus Handicap Inventory for Evaluating Treatment Effects. Otolaryngology. 145(2). 282–287. 163 indexed citations

4.

Lamont, Peter, Cláudia Coelho, & Andrew McKinlay. (2009). Explaining the unexplained: warranting disbelief in the paranormal. Discourse Studies. 11(5). 543–559. 13 indexed citations

5.

Coelho, Cláudia, et al.. (2008). Contacts by Distressed Individuals to UK Parapsychology and Anomalous Experience Academic Research Units - A Retrospective Survey Looking to the Future. 23. 31–59. 4 indexed citations

6.

Tyler, Richard S., Cláudia Coelho, Tao Pan, et al.. (2008). Identifying Tinnitus Subgroups With Cluster Analysis. American Journal of Audiology. 17(2). S176–84. 84 indexed citations

7.

Coelho, Cláudia, et al.. (2007). Distressed by anomalous experience: Early identification of psychosis. Clinical Psychology Forum. 1(170). 37–39. 1 indexed citations

8.

Tyler, Richard S., Cláudia Coelho, & William Noble. (2006). Tinnitus: Standard of Care, Personality Differences, Genetic Factors. ORL. 68(1). 14–22. 38 indexed citations

9.

Coelho, Cláudia, et al.. (2004). Características do zumbido em pacientes atendidos em serviço de referência. 8(3). 216–224. 28 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact