Stephan Kiefer

31 papers receiving 332 citations

Peers

Stephan Kiefer
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
  • Health Information Management 35
  • Applied Psychology 28
  • Health Informatics 5
  • Information Systems and Management 25
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 34
Replace Erin D. Foster with:
Erin D. Foster United States
Ailbhe N. Finnerty United Kingdom
Anna Sigríður Íslind Iceland
Ariel Deardorff United States
Carol Waudby United States
Fangjian Gao Germany
Belén Cruz Zapata Spain
Himalaya Patel United States
Pól Mac Aonghusa Ireland
Lena Griebel Germany
Stephan Kiefer relative to Erin D. Foster United States Erin D. Foster's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.3×
Erin D. Foster · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephan Kiefer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephan Kiefer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephan Kiefer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephan Kiefer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephan Kiefer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephan Kiefer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephan Kiefer. The network helps show where Stephan Kiefer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephan Kiefer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephan Kiefer Line = papers co-authored together Stephan Kiefer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20228
2 20204
3 201947
4 20198
5 201815
6 20187
7 201712
8 201745
9 20173
10 20162
11
Big Data in Support of the Digital Cancer Patient.
20162
12 20167
13 20151
14
Ensuring Profitability of Commercial Long Term Digital Preservation.
20121
15 20120
16 201034
17 200913
18 200715
19 198512
20 19844

About Stephan Kiefer

Stephan Kiefer is a scholar working on Issues, ethics and legal aspects, Health Information Management, Applied Psychology, Information Systems and Management and Conservation, having authored 34 papers that have together received 358 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies (6 papers), Semantic Web and Ontologies (5 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (4 papers), Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (4 papers), Mobile Health and mHealth Applications (4 papers), Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (3 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (3 papers) and Digital Mental Health Interventions (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Information Management (35 citations), Applied Psychology (28 citations), Health Informatics (5 citations), Information Systems and Management (25 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (34 citations). Stephan Kiefer has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Greece and United States. Frequent co-authors include Norbert Graf, Manolis Tsiknakis, Donald H. Mershon, Haridimos Kondylakis, Lefteris Koumakis, Kostas Marias, Mathias Brochhausen, Chiara Renzi, Feng Dong and Anca Bucur. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Biomedical Informatics, Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, Journal of Nursing Regulation, International Journal of Information Security and European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026