Nikolaus Forgó

971 total citations
34 papers, 180 citations indexed

About

Nikolaus Forgó is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Sociology and Political Science and Physiology. According to data from OpenAlex, Nikolaus Forgó has authored 34 papers receiving a total of 180 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 16 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 7 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 6 papers in Physiology. Recurrent topics in Nikolaus Forgó's work include Ethics in Clinical Research (15 papers), Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (6 papers) and Digitalization, Law, and Regulation (4 papers). Nikolaus Forgó is often cited by papers focused on Ethics in Clinical Research (15 papers), Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (6 papers) and Digitalization, Law, and Regulation (4 papers). Nikolaus Forgó collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Austria and United Kingdom. Nikolaus Forgó's co-authors include Barbara Prainsack, Philipp Bäumer, Marcelo Corrales Compagnucci, Norbert Graf, Mark Fenwick, Haridimos Kondylakis, Lefteris Koumakis, Kostas Marias, Regine Kollek and Manolis Tsiknakis and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature Medicine, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Scientific Reports.

In The Last Decade

Nikolaus Forgó

32 papers receiving 171 citations

Peers

Nikolaus Forgó

PHEOH

GHP

SPS

Mark Phillips Canada

Miranda Mourby United Kingdom

Santa Slokenberga Sweden

Martin Boeckhout Netherlands

Marta Rosecler Bez Brazil

Vasiliki Rahimzadeh United States

Dixie B. Baker United States

Fruzsina Molnár‐Gábor Germany

Peter O’Blenis Canada

Umberto Tachinardi United States

Mark Phillips Canada

Nikolaus Forgó

75 ×1.4

PHEOH

51 ×1.0

35 ×0.8

42 ×1.5

GHP

43 ×2.0

SPS

Citations per year, relative to Nikolaus Forgó Nikolaus Forgó (= 1×) peers Mark Phillips

Countries citing papers authored by Nikolaus Forgó

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nikolaus Forgó's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nikolaus Forgó with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nikolaus Forgó more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nikolaus Forgó

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nikolaus Forgó. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nikolaus Forgó. The network helps show where Nikolaus Forgó may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nikolaus Forgó

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nikolaus Forgó. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nikolaus Forgó based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nikolaus Forgó. Nikolaus Forgó is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Prainsack, Barbara & Nikolaus Forgó. (2024). New AI regulation in the EU seeks to reduce risk without assessing public benefit. Nature Medicine. 30(5). 1235–1237. 7 indexed citations

Czypionka, Thomas, Nikolaus Forgó, Peter Klimek, et al.. (2024). A national evaluation analysis and expert interview study of real-world data sources for research and healthcare decision-making. Scientific Reports. 14(1). 9751–9751. 2 indexed citations

Kritzinger, Sylvia, Hajo G. Boomgaarden, Nikolaus Forgó, et al.. (2023). Digitize! – Computational Social Science in der digitalen und sozialen Transformation. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 18(Sonderheft Forschung). 173–195. 1 indexed citations

Prainsack, Barbara, et al.. (2022). Data solidarity: a blueprint for governing health futures. The Lancet Digital Health. 4(11). e773–e774. 28 indexed citations

Prainsack, Barbara & Nikolaus Forgó. (2022). Why paying individual people for their health data is a bad idea. Nature Medicine. 28(10). 1989–1991. 7 indexed citations

Forgó, Nikolaus. (2020). Onlinelearning and Onlineteaching an der Rechtswissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Universität Wien unter COVID-19-Bedingungen von März bis November 2020 – ein persönlicher Erfahrungsbericht. 19(6). 203–203. 1 indexed citations

Schröder, Christina, Stephan Kiefer, Nikolaus Forgó, et al.. (2016). ecancermedicalscience. ecancermedicalscience. 8. 401–401. 2 indexed citations

Forgó, Nikolaus, et al.. (2016). Legal Perspectives on Post-mortem Use of Biomaterial and Data for Research: A Focus on the German Situation. European Journal of Health Law. 24(3). 311–327. 3 indexed citations

Kondylakis, Haridimos, Lefteris Koumakis, Nikolaus Forgó, et al.. (2016). Donor’s support tool: Enabling informed secondary use of patient’s biomaterial and personal data. International Journal of Medical Informatics. 97. 282–292. 26 indexed citations

10.

Forgó, Nikolaus, et al.. (2015). Using Patient Avatars to Promote Health Data Sharing Applications: Perspectives and Regulatory Challenges. European Journal of Health Law. 23(2). 175–194.

11.

Stamatakos, Georgios, Dimitra D. Dionysiou, Norbert Graf, et al.. (2014). Computational horizons in cancer (CHIC): Developing meta- and hyper-multiscale models and repositories for in Silico Oncology - A brief technical outline of the project. PubMed. 2014. 1–5. 4 indexed citations

12.

Forgó, Nikolaus, et al.. (2013). Using EHRs to design drug repositioning trials: A devolved approach to data protection. International Review of Law Computers & Technology. 28(2). 237–248. 3 indexed citations

13.

Djemame, Karim, Marcelo Corrales Compagnucci, Mariam Kiran, et al.. (2012). Legal issues in clouds: towards a risk inventory. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences. 371(1983). 20120075–20120075. 8 indexed citations

14.

Armstrong, Django, Karim Djemame, Marcelo Corrales Compagnucci, et al.. (2012). Assuring Data Privacy in Cloud Transformations. Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen). 1063–1069. 6 indexed citations

15.

Ziegler, Wolfgang, et al.. (2011). Legal restraints and security requirements on personal data and their technical implementation in clouds. Publikationsdatenbank der Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft). 1 indexed citations

16.

Forgó, Nikolaus, et al.. (2010). Ethical and Legal Requirements of Transnational Genetic Research. Nomos eBooks. 12 indexed citations

17.

Compagnucci, Marcelo Corrales, et al.. (2010). Intellectual property rights in e-health: balancing out the interests at stake – a Herculean task?. 3(3). 286–286. 1 indexed citations

18.

Forgó, Nikolaus, et al.. (2009). Data protection in grid-based multicentric clinical trials: killjoy or confidence-building measure?. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences. 367(1898). 2729–2739. 2 indexed citations

19.

Forgó, Nikolaus, et al.. (2008). Post-genomic clinical trials: the perspective of ACGT. ecancermedicalscience. 2. 2 indexed citations

20.

Forgó, Nikolaus, et al.. (2006). Zwecksetzung und informationelle Gewaltenteilung : ein Beitrag zu einem datenschutzgerechten E-Government. Nomos eBooks. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact