Michael F. Schafer

1.7k total citations
53 papers, 1.2k citations indexed

About

Michael F. Schafer is a scholar working on Surgery, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Michael F. Schafer has authored 53 papers receiving a total of 1.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 34 papers in Surgery, 13 papers in Pathology and Forensic Medicine and 12 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Recurrent topics in Michael F. Schafer's work include Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (15 papers), Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (13 papers) and Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment (9 papers). Michael F. Schafer is often cited by papers focused on Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (15 papers), Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (13 papers) and Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment (9 papers). Michael F. Schafer collaborates with scholars based in United States, Germany and Greece. Michael F. Schafer's co-authors include John F. Sarwark, Jason L. Koh, Jason E. Hsu, Stephen L. Ondra, Geoffrey S. Marecek, Gordon W. Nuber, Luciano Dias, Gregory A. Dumanian, Jerome D. Chao and John Liu and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery and Spine.

In The Last Decade

Michael F. Schafer

52 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Michael F. Schafer United States 19 922 420 178 147 137 53 1.2k
Martin J. Herman United States 16 634 0.7× 126 0.3× 59 0.3× 112 0.8× 94 0.7× 42 803
Patrick R. Olson United States 5 828 0.9× 568 1.4× 379 2.1× 72 0.5× 154 1.1× 6 1.1k
Alejandro Marquez‐Lara United States 24 1.3k 1.4× 817 1.9× 194 1.1× 114 0.8× 44 0.3× 71 1.7k
Amy M. Cizik United States 21 1.1k 1.2× 558 1.3× 150 0.8× 117 0.8× 39 0.3× 61 1.4k
Comron Saifi United States 19 1.1k 1.2× 583 1.4× 111 0.6× 134 0.9× 36 0.3× 80 1.2k
Joseph L. Laratta United States 21 1.1k 1.2× 654 1.6× 103 0.6× 125 0.9× 54 0.4× 56 1.3k
R. Carter Cassidy United States 14 518 0.6× 293 0.7× 168 0.9× 60 0.4× 29 0.2× 31 856
Arya G. Varthi United States 18 756 0.8× 431 1.0× 105 0.6× 51 0.3× 29 0.2× 64 941
Sam Adie Australia 21 974 1.1× 122 0.3× 69 0.4× 116 0.8× 79 0.6× 80 1.4k
Micheal Raad United States 16 642 0.7× 306 0.7× 109 0.6× 118 0.8× 26 0.2× 103 869

Countries citing papers authored by Michael F. Schafer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael F. Schafer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael F. Schafer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael F. Schafer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael F. Schafer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael F. Schafer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael F. Schafer. The network helps show where Michael F. Schafer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael F. Schafer

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael F. Schafer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael F. Schafer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michael F. Schafer. Michael F. Schafer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Brüggenjürgen, Bernd, Frank Braatz, Bernhard Greitemann, et al.. (2022). EXPERTS’ PERCEIVED PATIENT BURDEN AND OUTCOMES OF KNEE-ANKLE-FOOT-ORTHOSES (KAFOs) VS. MICROPROCESSOR-STANCE-AND-SWING-PHASE-CONTROLLED-KNEE-ANKLE-FOOT ORTHOSES (MP-SSCOs). SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 5(1). 37795–37795. 3 indexed citations
2.
Boody, Barrett S., Patrick Johnson, Andrew J. Pugely, et al.. (2016). Validation of a Web-Based Curriculum for Resident Education in Orthopedic Surgery. Journal of surgical education. 73(6). 1060–1065. 15 indexed citations
3.
Schafer, Michael F., et al.. (2014). HIPAA and Its Effect on Graduate Medical Education. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 96(2). e13–e13. 1 indexed citations
4.
Zeeni, Carine, Robert W. Gould, John F. Bebawy, et al.. (2014). The Implementation and Efficacy of the Northwestern High Risk Spine Protocol. World Neurosurgery. 82(6). e815–e823. 22 indexed citations
5.
Marecek, Geoffrey S. & Michael F. Schafer. (2013). Driving After Orthopaedic Surgery. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 21(11). 696–706. 55 indexed citations
6.
Murray, Michael R., et al.. (2012). Case report of an abscess developing at the site of a hematoma following a direct lateral interbody fusion. The Spine Journal. 12(7). e1–e4. 3 indexed citations
7.
Hsu, Wellington K., et al.. (2011). The Professional Athlete Spine Initiative: outcomes after lumbar disc herniation in 342 elite professional athletes. The Spine Journal. 11(3). 180–186. 83 indexed citations
8.
Halpin, Ryan J., Patrick A. Sugrue, Robert W. Gould, et al.. (2010). Standardizing Care for High-Risk Patients in Spine Surgery. Spine. 35(25). 2232–2238. 65 indexed citations
9.
Gross, Richard H., et al.. (2008). AOA Symposium. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 90(2). 429–437. 6 indexed citations
10.
Sokolowski, Mark, Mark Dolan, Arash Aminian, Michael Haak, & Michael F. Schafer. (2006). Delayed Epidural Hematoma After Spinal Surgery A Report of 4 Cases. Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques. 19(8). 603–606. 32 indexed citations
11.
Groeben, Harald, B. W. Böttiger, Michael F. Schafer, & J. Heine. (2005). Katecholaminrefraktäre Hypotension - aktuelle Entwicklungen. AINS - Anästhesiologie · Intensivmedizin · Notfallmedizin · Schmerztherapie. 40(7). 412–418. 3 indexed citations
12.
Cummins, Craig A., Terry M. Messer, & Michael F. Schafer. (2004). Infraspinatus Muscle Atrophy in Professional Baseball Players. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 32(1). 116–120. 34 indexed citations
13.
Sarwark, John F., et al.. (1999). Modification of Cotrel-Dubousset's Original Hook Constructs for Idiopathic Scoliosis. Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics. 19(4). 500–503. 2 indexed citations
14.
Toleikis, J. Richard, et al.. (1993). The Use of Dermatomal Evoked Responses During Surgical Procedures That Use Intrapedicular Fixation of the Lumbosacral Spine. Spine. 18(16). 2401–2407. 42 indexed citations
15.
Sarwark, John F., et al.. (1991). The Natural History of Congenital Kyphosis in Myelomeningocele. Spine. 16(Supplement). S351–S351. 34 indexed citations
16.
Shanks, C. A., et al.. (1984). Relationship between past academic performance and results of specialty in-training examinations. Academic Medicine. 59(4). 341–4. 13 indexed citations
17.
Schafer, Michael F. & Luciano Dias. (1983). Myelomeningocele, orthopaedic treatment. Williams & Wilkins eBooks. 4 indexed citations
18.
Ovassapian, Andranik, et al.. (1983). Anesthetic Management for Surgical Corrections of Severe Flexion Deformity of the Cervical Spine. Anesthesiology. 58(4). 370–372. 15 indexed citations
19.
Schafer, Michael F.. (1978). Dwyer Instrumentation of the Spine. Orthopedic Clinics of North America. 9(1). 115–122. 2 indexed citations
20.
Schafer, Michael F.. (1978). Dwyer instrumentation of the spine.. PubMed. 9(1). 115–22. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026