Stella de Bode

843 citations
20 papers · 640 indexed · h-index 13

Stella de Bode

19 papers receiving 615 citations

Peers

Stella de Bode
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 388
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 246
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 245
  • Sensory Systems 37
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 83
Replace Michael Lendt with:
Michael Lendt Germany
Lisa D. Stanford United States
Dana Chidekel United States
Isabelle Meresse France
Robert Melillo Israel
Juliana Sanchez Bloom United States
Efraı́n Santiago-Rodrı́guez Mexico
M Symms United Kingdom
Keisuke Wakusawa Japan
Philip Grewe Germany
Stella de Bode relative to Michael Lendt Germany Michael Lendt's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.1×
Michael Lendt · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stella de Bode

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stella de Bode's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stella de Bode with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stella de Bode more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stella de Bode

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stella de Bode. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stella de Bode. The network helps show where Stella de Bode may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stella de Bode, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stella de Bode Line = papers co-authored together Stella de Bode links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 201718
2 20166
3 201511
4 20158
5 20140
6 201334
7 20114
8
Intensive mobility training postcerebral hemispherectomy: early surgery shows best functional improvements.
201112
9 200910
10 200826
11 200715
12 200741
13 200546
14 200413
15 2004236
16 200351
17 200311
18 200157
19 200024
20 199917

About Stella de Bode

Stella de Bode is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Psychiatry and Mental health and Neurology, having authored 20 papers that have together received 640 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Language Development and Disorders (7 papers), Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (7 papers), Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (6 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (6 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (4 papers), Neonatal and fetal brain pathology (3 papers), Epilepsy research and treatment (3 papers) and Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (388 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (246 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (245 citations), Sensory Systems (37 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (83 citations). Stella de Bode has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and France. Frequent co-authors include Gary W. Mathern, Susan Curtiss, Bruce H. Dobkin, W. Donald Shields, Harry V. Vinters, Bin Hu, Snow Trinh T. Nguyen, Rinat Jonas, Christine LoPresti and Robert F. Asarnow. Their work appears in journals such as Brain and Language, Epilepsy & Behavior, Ear and Hearing, Brain and Cognition and Neurology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026