Philip Grewe

564 citations
23 papers · 373 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Philip Grewe

23 papers receiving 370 citations

Peers

Philip Grewe
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 222
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 178
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 126
  • Human-Computer Interaction 30
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 90
Replace Julia Berneiser with:
Julia Berneiser Germany
Chiara Pinardi Italy
Maeng-Keun Oh South Korea
Anina Ritterband‐Rosenbaum Denmark
Brent Hayman-Abello Canada
Pradeep N. Modur United States
Emmanuel Bui-Quoc France
Daniel J. Pittman Canada
Amelia M. Carton United Kingdom
Elaine T Kiriakopoulos United States
Philip Grewe relative to Julia Berneiser Germany Julia Berneiser's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10.3×
Julia Berneiser · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Philip Grewe

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip Grewe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip Grewe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip Grewe more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip Grewe

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip Grewe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip Grewe. The network helps show where Philip Grewe may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Philip Grewe, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Philip Grewe Line = papers co-authored together Philip Grewe links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201695
2 201948
3 201343
4 201339
5 201631
6 201830
7 202212
8 201311
9 202210
10 201910
11 20199
12 20234
13 20174
14 20224
15 20124
16 20134
17 20243
18 20233
19 20193
20 20143

About Philip Grewe

Philip Grewe is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Cognitive Neuroscience, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Surgery, having authored 23 papers that have together received 373 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Epilepsy research and treatment (10 papers), Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies (9 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (6 papers), Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts (3 papers), Augmented Reality Applications (3 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (3 papers), Face Recognition and Perception (3 papers) and Surgical Simulation and Training (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (222 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (178 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (126 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (30 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (90 citations). Philip Grewe has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Christian G. Bien, Martina Piefke, Friedrich G. Woermann, Thilo Kalbhenn, Reinhard Schulz, Tilman Polster, Theodor W. May, Thomas Cloppenborg, Ingmar Blümcke and Mario Botsch. Their work appears in journals such as Epilepsy & Behavior, Epilepsia, Cortex, Epilepsy Research and Neurocase.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact