John R. Chamberlin

1.3k total citations
18 papers, 790 citations indexed

About

John R. Chamberlin is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Political Science and International Relations and Management Science and Operations Research. According to data from OpenAlex, John R. Chamberlin has authored 18 papers receiving a total of 790 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 14 papers in Economics and Econometrics, 7 papers in Political Science and International Relations and 6 papers in Management Science and Operations Research. Recurrent topics in John R. Chamberlin's work include Game Theory and Voting Systems (8 papers), Electoral Systems and Political Participation (7 papers) and Game Theory and Applications (5 papers). John R. Chamberlin is often cited by papers focused on Game Theory and Voting Systems (8 papers), Electoral Systems and Political Participation (7 papers) and Game Theory and Applications (5 papers). John R. Chamberlin collaborates with scholars based in United States. John R. Chamberlin's co-authors include Paul N. Courant, Clyde H. Coombs, Jerry L. Cohen, Michael D. Cohen, John E. Jackson and W. Thompson and has published in prestigious journals such as American Psychologist, American Political Science Review and The Journal of Politics.

In The Last Decade

John R. Chamberlin

17 papers receiving 691 citations

Peers

John R. Chamberlin
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Economics and Econometrics 516
  • Management Science and Operations Research 226
  • Safety Research 197
  • Political Science and International Relations 194
  • Sociology and Political Science 151
Replace Michael Taylor with:
Michael Taylor United Kingdom
Nicholas R. Miller United States
Robin Farquharson South Africa
Aanund Hylland United States
John Bonner United Kingdom
Myrna Wooders United States
Wulf Gaertner Germany
François Maniquet Belgium
Stefan Napel Germany
Ramón Marimon Spain
Michael Taylor United Kingdom View profile →
Citations per field, relative to John R. Chamberlin
John R. Chamberlin · 1×
Citations per year, relative to John R. Chamberlin
John R. Chamberlin · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by John R. Chamberlin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John R. Chamberlin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John R. Chamberlin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John R. Chamberlin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John R. Chamberlin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John R. Chamberlin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John R. Chamberlin. The network helps show where John R. Chamberlin may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of John R. Chamberlin

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John R. Chamberlin. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John R. Chamberlin based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John R. Chamberlin. John R. Chamberlin is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 3
2 9
3 12
4 13
5 11
6 5
7 43
8 49
9 14
10 161
11 1
12 23
13 3
14 9
15 35
16 13
17 111
18 275

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026