Stan J. Knapp

699 total citations
11 papers, 422 citations indexed

About

Stan J. Knapp is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology and Demography. According to data from OpenAlex, Stan J. Knapp has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 422 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 5 papers in Social Psychology and 4 papers in Demography. Recurrent topics in Stan J. Knapp's work include Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (3 papers), Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics (3 papers) and Family Dynamics and Relationships (3 papers). Stan J. Knapp is often cited by papers focused on Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (3 papers), Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics (3 papers) and Family Dynamics and Relationships (3 papers). Stan J. Knapp collaborates with scholars based in United States. Stan J. Knapp's co-authors include David M. Klein, James M. White, Jill Quadagno, Debra Street, Larry W. Isaac, Thomas B. Holman, Robert Madsen and Carol Ward and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Marriage and the Family, Sociological Methods & Research and Sociological Quarterly.

In The Last Decade

Stan J. Knapp

11 papers receiving 353 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Stan J. Knapp United States 9 242 113 107 88 38 11 422
Mihaela Robila United States 14 258 1.1× 107 0.9× 109 1.0× 141 1.6× 56 1.5× 25 480
Raeann R. Hamon United States 10 233 1.0× 119 1.1× 92 0.9× 89 1.0× 65 1.7× 26 446
Julia Griggs Israel 10 237 1.0× 137 1.2× 48 0.4× 48 0.5× 61 1.6× 18 429
Linda Skogrand United States 11 310 1.3× 259 2.3× 233 2.2× 84 1.0× 43 1.1× 39 540
Carolyn Stout Morgan United States 9 200 0.8× 95 0.8× 100 0.9× 76 0.9× 35 0.9× 15 373
Yochanan Peres Israel 13 308 1.3× 113 1.0× 96 0.9× 55 0.6× 34 0.9× 26 465
Yvonne D. Newsome United States 4 271 1.1× 89 0.8× 53 0.5× 99 1.1× 88 2.3× 6 472
Margaret Ward Australia 12 237 1.0× 59 0.5× 37 0.3× 72 0.8× 50 1.3× 44 429
Nicole L. Asquith Australia 14 225 0.9× 55 0.5× 97 0.9× 80 0.9× 77 2.0× 49 436
Rogelia Pe‐Pua Australia 10 251 1.0× 36 0.3× 110 1.0× 102 1.2× 57 1.5× 11 440

Countries citing papers authored by Stan J. Knapp

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stan J. Knapp's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stan J. Knapp with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stan J. Knapp more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stan J. Knapp

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stan J. Knapp. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stan J. Knapp. The network helps show where Stan J. Knapp may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stan J. Knapp

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stan J. Knapp. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stan J. Knapp based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stan J. Knapp. Stan J. Knapp is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
1.
Knapp, Stan J., et al.. (2019). Theorizing Family Change: A Review and Reconceptualization. Journal of Family Theory & Review. 11(2). 212–229. 14 indexed citations
2.
Knapp, Stan J.. (2015). The Ethical Phenomenology of Emmanuel Levinas: Drawing on Phenomenology to Explore the Central Features of Family Life. Journal of Family Theory & Review. 7(3). 225–241. 13 indexed citations
3.
Ward, Carol, et al.. (2014). Mentored Research in a Tribal College Setting: The Northern Cheyenne Case. ScholarsArchive (Brigham Young University). 29(3). 1. 7 indexed citations
4.
Knapp, Stan J. & Thomas B. Holman. (2010). Introducing a Special Issue: On the Need to Theorize Marital Quality. Journal of Family Theory & Review. 2(4). 221–226. 7 indexed citations
5.
Knapp, Stan J., et al.. (2010). Forming the Central Framework for a Science of Marital Quality: An Interpretive Alternative to Marital Satisfaction as a Proxy for Marital Quality. Journal of Family Theory & Review. 2(4). 316–333. 14 indexed citations
6.
Knapp, Stan J.. (2009). Critical Theorizing: Enhancing Theoretical Rigor in Family Research. Journal of Family Theory & Review. 1(3). 133–145. 28 indexed citations
7.
Knapp, Stan J.. (2002). Authorizing Family Science: An Analysis of the Objectifying Practices of Family Science Discourse. Journal of Marriage and the Family. 64(4). 1038–1048. 8 indexed citations
8.
Knapp, Stan J.. (1999). Analyzing Narratives of Expertise: Toward the Development of a Burkeian Pentadic Scheme. Sociological Quarterly. 40(4). 587–612. 11 indexed citations
9.
Knapp, Stan J., David M. Klein, & James M. White. (1996). Family Theories: An Introduction. Journal of Marriage and the Family. 58(4). 1040–1040. 209 indexed citations
10.
Isaac, Larry W., Debra Street, & Stan J. Knapp. (1994). Analyzing Historical Contingency with Formal Methods. Sociological Methods & Research. 23(1). 114–141. 31 indexed citations
11.
Quadagno, Jill & Stan J. Knapp. (1992). Have Historical Sociologists Forsaken Theory?. Sociological Methods & Research. 20(4). 481–507. 80 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026