Sexual Medicine Reviews

About

The 601 papers published in Sexual Medicine Reviews in the last decades have received a total of 11.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Sexual Medicine Reviews usually cover Psychiatry and Mental health (393 papers), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (173 papers) and Clinical Psychology (158 papers) specifically the topics of Sexual function and dysfunction studies (391 papers), Hormonal and reproductive studies (154 papers) and Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (135 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Sexual Medicine Reviews are Wayne J.G. Hellstrom, Alexander W. Pastuszak, Emmanuele A. Jannini, Andrew Gabrielson, Hoang M. Nguyen, Faysal A. Yafi, Arthur L. Burnett, Irwin Goldstein, Abdulmaged M. Traish and Linda Vignozzi.

In The Last Decade

Sexual Medicine Reviews

549 papers receiving 10.7k citations

Countries where authors publish in Sexual Medicine Reviews

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Sexual Medicine Reviews. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Sexual Medicine Reviews with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sexual Medicine Reviews more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Sexual Medicine Reviews

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Sexual Medicine Reviews. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Sexual Medicine Reviews.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026