Stacy Campbell-Bright

514 total citations
11 papers, 304 citations indexed

About

Stacy Campbell-Bright is a scholar working on Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Epidemiology. According to data from OpenAlex, Stacy Campbell-Bright has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 304 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, 3 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and 3 papers in Epidemiology. Recurrent topics in Stacy Campbell-Bright's work include Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (3 papers), Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (2 papers) and Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (2 papers). Stacy Campbell-Bright is often cited by papers focused on Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (3 papers), Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (2 papers) and Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (2 papers). Stacy Campbell-Bright collaborates with scholars based in United States. Stacy Campbell-Bright's co-authors include Shannon S. Carson, John P. Kress, Jo E. Rodgers, Lydia Chang, Jesse Hall, Joseph E. Levitt, Ashley G. Henderson, Anne S. Pohlman, Anastasia Ivanova and Preston B. Rich and has published in prestigious journals such as Critical Care Medicine, Annals of Pharmacotherapy and American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy.

In The Last Decade

Stacy Campbell-Bright

10 papers receiving 293 citations

Peers

Stacy Campbell-Bright
Nada S. Al‐Qadheeb United States
Kellie R. Murry United States
Shay McGuiness Australia
Andrew Egol United States
Annalisa Casarin United Kingdom
Huibert H. Ponssen Netherlands
Iain McCullagh United Kingdom
Nada S. Al‐Qadheeb United States
Stacy Campbell-Bright
Citations per year, relative to Stacy Campbell-Bright Stacy Campbell-Bright (= 1×) peers Nada S. Al‐Qadheeb

Countries citing papers authored by Stacy Campbell-Bright

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stacy Campbell-Bright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stacy Campbell-Bright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stacy Campbell-Bright more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stacy Campbell-Bright

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stacy Campbell-Bright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stacy Campbell-Bright. The network helps show where Stacy Campbell-Bright may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stacy Campbell-Bright

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stacy Campbell-Bright. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stacy Campbell-Bright based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stacy Campbell-Bright. Stacy Campbell-Bright is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
2.
Austin, Charles, et al.. (2021). Development and Implementation of a Multicomponent Protocol to Promote Sleep and Reduce Delirium in a Medical Intensive Care Unit. Annals of Pharmacotherapy. 56(6). 645–655. 7 indexed citations
3.
Campbell-Bright, Stacy, et al.. (2021). Accuracy and safety of medication histories obtained at the time of intensive care unit admission of delirious or mechanically ventilated patients. American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy. 78(8). 736–742. 3 indexed citations
4.
Jean, Stéphanie, et al.. (2019). Evaluation of the Safety of Intravenous Thiamine Administration in a Large Academic Medical Center. Journal of Pharmacy Practice. 34(3). 397–402. 6 indexed citations
5.
Beach, Katherine F., et al.. (2019). 1328: DISCONTINUATION OF ANTIPSYCHOTICS FOR ICU DELIRIUM POST-ICU TRANSFER AND DISCHARGE. Critical Care Medicine. 48(1). 641–641. 1 indexed citations
6.
Sullivan, Kelly A., Meghan M. Caylor, Feng‐Chang Lin, & Stacy Campbell-Bright. (2016). Comparison of Amphotericin B Bladder Irrigations Versus Fluconazole for the Treatment of Candiduria in Intensive Care Unit Patients. Journal of Pharmacy Practice. 30(3). 347–352. 12 indexed citations
7.
Maguire, Jane, et al.. (2015). Impact of an Antibiotic-specific Sepsis Bundle on Appropriate and Timely Antibiotic Administration for Severe Sepsis in the Emergency Department. Journal of Emergency Medicine. 50(1). 79–88.e1. 17 indexed citations
8.
Hall, W. B., Jason M. Kidd, Stacy Campbell-Bright, Melissa B. Miller, & Robert M. Aris. (2011). Clinical Manifestations And Impact Of Human Metapneumovirus In Healthy Adults: A Retrospective Analysis Of 28 Patients Over 2 Years. A4927–A4927. 3 indexed citations
9.
Cox, Christopher E., Shelby D. Reed, Joseph A. Govert, et al.. (2008). Economic evaluation of propofol and lorazepam for critically ill patients undergoing mechanical ventilation*. Critical Care Medicine. 36(3). 706–714. 33 indexed citations
10.
Carson, Shannon S., John P. Kress, Jo E. Rodgers, et al.. (2006). A randomized trial of intermittent lorazepam versus propofol with daily interruption in mechanically ventilated patients*. Critical Care Medicine. 34(5). 1326–1332. 200 indexed citations
11.
Dupuis, Robert E., et al.. (1996). Multiple Delayed Peak Lithium Concentrations following Acute Intoxication with an Extended-Release Product. Annals of Pharmacotherapy. 30(4). 356–360. 22 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026