Stacey Short

460 total citations
2 papers, 23 citations indexed

About

Stacey Short is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Sociology and Political Science and History. According to data from OpenAlex, Stacey Short has authored 2 papers receiving a total of 23 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 2 papers in Literature and Literary Theory, 1 paper in Sociology and Political Science and 1 paper in History. Recurrent topics in Stacey Short's work include Rhetoric and Communication Studies (1 paper), Literature, Film, and Journalism Analysis (1 paper) and Autobiographical and Biographical Writing (1 paper). Stacey Short is often cited by papers focused on Rhetoric and Communication Studies (1 paper), Literature, Film, and Journalism Analysis (1 paper) and Autobiographical and Biographical Writing (1 paper). Stacey Short collaborates with scholars based in . Stacey Short's co-authors include Barbara Green and has published in prestigious journals such as Tulsa Studies in Women s Literature.

In The Last Decade

Stacey Short

2 papers receiving 15 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Stacey Short	2	11	10	7	7	5	2	23
Anne Fernihough	5	8 0.7×	8 0.8×	7 1.0×	24 3.4×	5 1.0×	7	31
Edward Kennard Rand	2	9 0.8×	22 2.2×	9 1.3×	5 0.7×		6	47
Emmanuèle Baumgartner France	4	13 1.2×	5 0.5×	3 0.4×	12 1.7×		26	52
Lynn S. Joy United States	3	9 0.8×	14 1.4×	4 0.6×	7 1.0×		10	44
Walter Haug Germany	6	16 1.5×	10 1.0×	8 1.1×	19 2.7×		35	83
Wolfgang Haubrichs Germany	4	9 0.8×	3 0.3×	5 0.7×	7 1.0×	1 0.2×	24	35
Thomas Warton	3	13 1.2×	3 0.3×	6 0.9×	16 2.3×		10	43
Richard Firth Green Canada	5	25 2.3×	5 0.5×	6 0.9×	17 2.4×		15	51
Fabio Stok Italy	4	7 0.6×	7 0.7×	2 0.3×	5 0.7×		21	25
W. H. Mallock	2	5 0.5×	4 0.4×	6 0.9×	3 0.4×	1 0.2×	10	14

Countries citing papers authored by Stacey Short

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stacey Short's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stacey Short with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stacey Short more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stacey Short

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stacey Short. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stacey Short. The network helps show where Stacey Short may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stacey Short

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stacey Short. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stacey Short based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stacey Short. Stacey Short is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

2 of 2 papers shown

1.

Short, Stacey & Barbara Green. (1999). Spectacular Confessions: Autobiography, Performative Activism, and the Sites of Suffrage, 1905-1938. Tulsa Studies in Women s Literature. 18(1). 120–120. 7 indexed citations

2.

Short, Stacey, et al.. (1999). Lives of Their Own: Rhetorical Dimensions in Autobiographies of Women Activists. Tulsa Studies in Women s Literature. 18(2). 367–367. 16 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact