Stacey G. Moe

24 papers receiving 907 citations

Peers

Stacey G. Moe
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 587
  • Pharmacy 86
  • Applied Psychology 87
  • General Health Professions 301
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 152
Replace Jeffery J. Honas with:
Jeffery J. Honas United States
Susanne Kobel Germany
Jennette P. Moreno United States
Gisela Nyberg Sweden
Jorge A. Banda United States
Maria Alice Altenburg de Assis Brazil
Lisa Newson United Kingdom
Lenka H. Shriver United States
Leah M. Lipsky United States
Richard E. Boles United States
Stacey G. Moe relative to Jeffery J. Honas United States Jeffery J. Honas's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.9×
Jeffery J. Honas · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stacey G. Moe

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stacey G. Moe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stacey G. Moe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stacey G. Moe more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stacey G. Moe

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stacey G. Moe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stacey G. Moe. The network helps show where Stacey G. Moe may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stacey G. Moe, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stacey G. Moe Line = papers co-authored together Stacey G. Moe links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008150
2 2012136
3 2006112
4 200758
5 200855
6 201544
7 201641
8 201041
9 201137
10 201034
11 201934
12 200832
13 201629
14 201428
15 202122
16 201222
17 201518
18 200617
19 200916
20 202313

About Stacey G. Moe

Stacey G. Moe is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology, Physiology and Pharmacy, having authored 24 papers that have together received 963 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (17 papers), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (7 papers), Nutritional Studies and Diet (6 papers), Physical Activity and Health (5 papers), Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling (5 papers), Mobile Health and mHealth Applications (4 papers), Health and Lifestyle Studies (3 papers) and Obesity and Health Practices (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (587 citations), Pharmacy (86 citations), Applied Psychology (87 citations), General Health Professions (301 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (152 citations). Stacey G. Moe has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Keryn E. Pasch, Melissa N. Laska, Leslie A. Lytle, Leslie Lytle, Jayne A. Fulkerson, Melissa C. Nelson, Jessica Duncan Cance, Leslie A. Lytle, Lara Latimer and Marilyn S. Nanney. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, American Journal of Preventive Medicine, Journal of Nutrition, Health Education & Behavior and Journal of Youth and Adolescence.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact