Soul Shava
- Plant Science
- Forestry top 5%
- Food Science
- General Agricultural and Biological Sciences top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Co-authors
- Marianne E. KrasnyAlfred MaroyiM.P. TshisikhaweSebua Silas SemenyaM.J. PotgieterKeith G. TidballRob O’DonoghueRegis Chireshe
- Topics
- African studies and sociopolitical issues (3 papers)Urban Agriculture and Sustainability (3 papers)Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development (3 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaJournal of EthnopharmacologyEnvironmental Education Research
- Partner nations
- South AfricaUnited StatesZimbabwe
In The Last Decade
Soul Shava
10 papers receiving 179 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
- Plant Science 113
- Forestry 44
- Food Science 31
- General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 29
- Sociology and Political Science 23
Countries citing papers authored by Soul Shava
This map shows the geographic impact of Soul Shava's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Soul Shava with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Soul Shava more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Soul Shava
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Soul Shava. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Soul Shava. The network helps show where Soul Shava may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Soul Shava
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Soul Shava. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Soul Shava based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Soul Shava. Soul Shava is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 7 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 70 | |
| 7 | 49 | |
| 8 | Local knowledge as a source of community resilience : IKS community development and resilience | 4 |
| 9 | 33 | |
| 10 | Research on Indigenous Knowledge and its Application: A Case of Wild Food Plants of Zimbabwe | 24 |
About Soul Shava
Soul Shava is a scholar working on Archeology, Business and International Management and General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, having authored 10 papers that have together received 198 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include African studies and sociopolitical issues (3 papers), Urban Agriculture and Sustainability (3 papers) and Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Forestry (44 citations), General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (29 citations) and Plant Science (113 citations). Soul Shava has collaborated with scholars based in South Africa, United States and Zimbabwe. Frequent co-authors include Marianne E. Krasny, Alfred Maroyi, M.P. Tshisikhawe, Sebua Silas Semenya, M.J. Potgieter, Keith G. Tidball, Rob O’Donoghue and Regis Chireshe. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Journal of Ethnopharmacology and Environmental Education Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.