Sophie Theis

1.3k citations
15 papers · 858 indexed · 1 hit paper · h-index 10

Sophie Theis

14 papers receiving 802 citations

Hit Papers

Women in agriculture: Four myths2017202620202023201750100150200

Peers

Sophie Theis
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
  • General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 344
  • Soil Science 218
  • Economics and Econometrics 186
  • Safety Research 173
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 148
Replace Gero Carletto with:
Gero Carletto United States
Gbemisola Oseni United States
Katia Covarrubias Italy
Guush Berhane United States
Anke Niehof Netherlands
Esteban J. Quiñones United States
Chiara Kovarik United States
André Croppenstedt Italy
Todd Benson United States
Carlo Azzarri United States
Sophie Theis relative to Gero Carletto United States Gero Carletto's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.6×
Gero Carletto · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Sophie Theis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sophie Theis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sophie Theis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sophie Theis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sophie Theis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sophie Theis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sophie Theis. The network helps show where Sophie Theis may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sophie Theis

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sophie Theis. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sophie Theis based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sophie Theis. Sophie Theis is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 4
2 32
3 88
4 39
5 77
6 118
7
Women in agriculture: Four mythsbreakdown →
239
8 21
9 185
10
Women's Land Rights as a Pathway to Poverty Reduction: A Framework and Review of Available Evidence
1
11 25
12 25
13
Bahia state agriculture sector risk analysis
1
14
Towards optimal coordination of the Chilean Agricultural Innovation System: Design for a MINAGRI Agricultural Innovation Coordination Unit
1
15 2

About Sophie Theis

Sophie Theis is a scholar working on Business and International Management, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences and Safety Research, having authored 15 papers that have together received 858 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development (5 papers), Agricultural Innovations and Practices (5 papers) and Land Rights and Reforms (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (344 citations), Business and International Management (55 citations) and Soil Science (218 citations). Sophie Theis has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Ivory Coast. Frequent co-authors include Ruth Meinzen‐Dick, Cheryl R. Doss, Agnes Quisumbing, Hazel Malapit, Nicole Lefore, Elizabeth Bryan, Rahul Chaturvedi, Marco A. Janssen, Rajendra Pradhan and Bassirou Bonfoh. Their work appears in journals such as World Development, Journal of Rural Studies and Agricultural Systems.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026