Simon Clay
Impact in
- Ophthalmology top 5%
- Glaucoma and retinal disorders
- Retinal Diseases and Treatments
-
- Retinopathy of Prematurity Studies
- Retinal Imaging and Analysis
Papers in
-
- Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology 3
-
- Sex work and related issues 2
- Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics 2
- Co-authors
- Alistair R. Fielder (3 shared papers)Merrick J. Moseley (2 shared papers)Kim H. Parker (2 shared papers)Jeffrey Ng (2 shared papers)Carl Paterson (2 shared papers)Graham E. Quinn (1 shared paper)Anna L. Ells (1 shared paper)K. D. Cocker (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science (2 papers)Sexualities (2 papers)International Journal of Drug Policy (2 papers)Drug and Alcohol Review (2 papers)Qualitative Inquiry (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Simon Clay
14 papers receiving 287 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 37
- Ophthalmology 113
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 228
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 55
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 33
- Health Informatics 1
Countries citing papers authored by Simon Clay
This map shows the geographic impact of Simon Clay's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Simon Clay with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Simon Clay more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Simon Clay
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Simon Clay. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Simon Clay. The network helps show where Simon Clay may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Simon Clay, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2008 | 149 | |
| 2 | 2006 | 70 | |
| 3 | 2009 | 44 | |
| 4 | 2023 | 16 | |
| 5 | 2021 | 5 | |
| 6 | 2023 | 4 | |
| 7 | 2024 | 2 | |
| 8 | 2022 | 2 | |
| 9 | 2024 | 2 | |
| 10 | 2021 | 2 | |
| 11 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 12 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 13 | 2022 | 1 | |
| 14 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 15 | 2025 | 0 |
About Simon Clay
Simon Clay is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Epidemiology, Gender Studies and General Health Professions, having authored 15 papers that have together received 300 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (4 papers), Gender, Feminism, and Media (3 papers), Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (3 papers), Sex work and related issues (2 papers), Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (2 papers), Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics (2 papers), Retinal Imaging and Analysis (1 paper) and Gender, Security, and Conflict (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (113 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (228 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (55 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (33 citations) and Health Informatics (1 citation). Simon Clay has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Alistair R. Fielder, Merrick J. Moseley, Kim H. Parker, Jeffrey Ng, Carl Paterson, Graham E. Quinn, Anna L. Ells, K. D. Cocker, Clare Wilson and W E Schulenburg. Their work appears in journals such as Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Sexualities, International Journal of Drug Policy, Drug and Alcohol Review and Qualitative Inquiry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.