Sílvia M. Mendes
- Political Science and International Relations top 2%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Strategy and Management top 10%
- Economics and Econometrics top 10%
- Communication top 10%
- Co-authors
- Christopher J. AndersonMichael D. McDonaldIan BudgeYuliya V. TverdovaMyung-Hee KimAntónio F. TavaresPedro J. Camões
- Topics
- Electoral Systems and Political Participation (5 papers)Crime Patterns and Interventions (5 papers)Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesPortugalSpain
In The Last Decade
Sílvia M. Mendes
14 papers receiving 462 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
- Political Science and International Relations 379
- Sociology and Political Science 212
- Strategy and Management 113
- Economics and Econometrics 88
- Communication 51
Countries citing papers authored by Sílvia M. Mendes
This map shows the geographic impact of Sílvia M. Mendes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sílvia M. Mendes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sílvia M. Mendes more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Sílvia M. Mendes
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sílvia M. Mendes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sílvia M. Mendes. The network helps show where Sílvia M. Mendes may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sílvia M. Mendes
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sílvia M. Mendes. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sílvia M. Mendes based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sílvia M. Mendes. Sílvia M. Mendes is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10 | |
| 2 | 6 | |
| 3 | 13 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | Performance measurement of the portuguese police force using the balanced scorecard | 2 |
| 6 | 72 | |
| 7 | 93 | |
| 8 | Learning to lose : election outcomes, democratic | 0 |
| 9 | Personal economic hardship, happiness, and political satisfaction : a cross-national analysis | 0 |
| 10 | 30 | |
| 11 | 2 | |
| 12 | 131 | |
| 13 | 115 | |
| 14 | The dimensionality of the Portuguese party policy space | 2 |
| 15 | Winning, losing, and political trust across political generations | 0 |
| 16 | 45 | |
| 17 | 8 |
About Sílvia M. Mendes
Sílvia M. Mendes is a scholar working on Public Administration, Communication and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 17 papers that have together received 531 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electoral Systems and Political Participation (5 papers), Crime Patterns and Interventions (5 papers) and Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (379 citations), Strategy and Management (113 citations) and Communication (51 citations). Sílvia M. Mendes has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Portugal and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Christopher J. Anderson, Michael D. McDonald, Ian Budge, Yuliya V. Tverdova, Myung-Hee Kim, Michael D. McDonald, António F. Tavares and Pedro J. Camões. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Political Science, Journal of Leisure Research and Policy Studies Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.