Daniel Bischof

1.2k citations
23 papers · 695 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel Bischof

23 papers receiving 668 citations

Peers

Daniel Bischof
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
  • Political Science and International Relations 506
  • Communication 138
  • Gender Studies 97
  • Strategy and Management 124
  • Sociology and Political Science 280
Replace Filip Kostelka with:
Filip Kostelka United Kingdom
Mitchell S. Sanders United States
Ferrán Martínez i Coma Australia
Willy Jou Japan
Zsolt Enyedi Austria
Andrew Rehfeld United States
Brad Lockerbie United States
Matthew P. Hitt United States
Brandon L. Bartels United States
Luke March United Kingdom
Daniel Bischof relative to Filip Kostelka United Kingdom Filip Kostelka's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Filip Kostelka · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Bischof

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Bischof's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Bischof with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Bischof more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Bischof

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Bischof. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Bischof. The network helps show where Daniel Bischof may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Bischof, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Bischof Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Bischof links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017150
2 2019116
3 201783
4 201279
5 201567
6 201729
7 202127
8 201722
9 202017
10 202114
11 201913
12 201712
13 202311
14 201711
15 201511
16 202110
17 20237
18 20214
19 20234
20 20233

About Daniel Bischof

Daniel Bischof is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Strategy and Management, Communication, Sociology and Political Science and Public Administration, having authored 23 papers that have together received 695 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electoral Systems and Political Participation (15 papers), Political Influence and Corporate Strategies (8 papers), Social Media and Politics (7 papers), Policy Transfer and Learning (5 papers), Populism, Right-Wing Movements (4 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (3 papers), Migration, Refugees, and Integration (2 papers) and Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (506 citations), Communication (138 citations), Gender Studies (97 citations), Strategy and Management (124 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (280 citations). Daniel Bischof has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, Denmark and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Markus Wagner, Roman Senninger, Thomas Saalfeld, Florian Foos, Luca Bernardi, Simon Fink, Ruud Wouters, Laura Morales, Lawrence Ezrow and Daniel Ziblatt. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Politics, American Political Science Review, Political Science Research and Methods, West European Politics and Swiss Political Science Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact