Daniel Bischof

1.2k total citations
23 papers, 695 citations indexed

About

Daniel Bischof is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Strategy and Management and Communication. According to data from OpenAlex, Daniel Bischof has authored 23 papers receiving a total of 695 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 19 papers in Political Science and International Relations, 8 papers in Strategy and Management and 7 papers in Communication. Recurrent topics in Daniel Bischof's work include Electoral Systems and Political Participation (15 papers), Political Influence and Corporate Strategies (8 papers) and Social Media and Politics (7 papers). Daniel Bischof is often cited by papers focused on Electoral Systems and Political Participation (15 papers), Political Influence and Corporate Strategies (8 papers) and Social Media and Politics (7 papers). Daniel Bischof collaborates with scholars based in Switzerland, Denmark and United Kingdom. Daniel Bischof's co-authors include Markus Wagner, Roman Senninger, Thomas Saalfeld, Florian Foos, Luca Bernardi, Ruud Wouters, Laura Morales, Simon Fink, Lawrence Ezrow and Fabio Wolkenstein and has published in prestigious journals such as American Political Science Review, American Journal of Political Science and The Journal of Politics.

In The Last Decade

Daniel Bischof

23 papers receiving 668 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Daniel Bischof Switzerland 12 506 280 138 124 97 23 695
Filip Kostelka United Kingdom 11 632 1.2× 302 1.1× 162 1.2× 105 0.8× 109 1.1× 16 807
Bernhard Weßels Germany 14 629 1.2× 267 1.0× 143 1.0× 134 1.1× 52 0.5× 71 783
Zsolt Enyedi Austria 20 903 1.8× 538 1.9× 145 1.1× 103 0.8× 73 0.8× 46 1.2k
Ferrán Martínez i Coma Australia 15 549 1.1× 378 1.4× 98 0.7× 56 0.5× 62 0.6× 56 739
M. V. Hood United States 15 563 1.1× 445 1.6× 87 0.6× 104 0.8× 144 1.5× 59 821
Bruno Wüest Switzerland 7 685 1.4× 318 1.1× 107 0.8× 126 1.0× 33 0.3× 20 839
Antonis A. Ellinas Cyprus 15 581 1.1× 345 1.2× 75 0.5× 70 0.6× 48 0.5× 31 715
Luke March United Kingdom 15 1.0k 2.1× 569 2.0× 136 1.0× 78 0.6× 41 0.4× 42 1.2k
Andrew Rehfeld United States 7 451 0.9× 213 0.8× 88 0.6× 86 0.7× 124 1.3× 16 606
Toni Rodón Spain 15 496 1.0× 240 0.9× 86 0.6× 39 0.3× 39 0.4× 50 640

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Bischof

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Bischof's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Bischof with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Bischof more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Bischof

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Bischof. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Bischof. The network helps show where Daniel Bischof may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daniel Bischof

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daniel Bischof. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daniel Bischof based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Daniel Bischof. Daniel Bischof is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Bischof, Daniel & Roman Senninger. (2025). Can Simple Language Affect Voters' Political Knowledge and Their Beliefs About Politicians?. The Journal of Politics. 2 indexed citations
2.
Ziblatt, Daniel, et al.. (2023). Wealth of Tongues: Why Peripheral Regions Vote for the Radical Right in Germany. American Political Science Review. 118(3). 1480–1496. 11 indexed citations
3.
Dumont, Patrick, Albert Falcó-Gimeno, Indridi Indridason, & Daniel Bischof. (2023). Pieces of the puzzle? Coalition formation and tangential preferences. West European Politics. 47(1). 61–87. 3 indexed citations
4.
Bischof, Daniel & Thomas Kurer. (2023). Place-Based Campaigning: The Political Impact of Real Grassroots Mobilization. The Journal of Politics. 85(3). 984–1002. 4 indexed citations
5.
Bischof, Daniel, et al.. (2023). Out-Group Threat and Xenophobic Hate Crimes: Evidence of Local Intergroup Conflict Dynamics between Immigrants and Natives. The Journal of Politics. 86(4). 1146–1161. 7 indexed citations
6.
Senninger, Roman & Daniel Bischof. (2021). Do voters want domestic politicians to scrutinize the European Union?. Political Science Research and Methods. 11(2). 410–418. 4 indexed citations
7.
Senninger, Roman, Daniel Bischof, & Lawrence Ezrow. (2021). How transnational party alliances influence national parties' policies. Political Science Research and Methods. 10(3). 651–658. 14 indexed citations
8.
Wolkenstein, Fabio, Roman Senninger, & Daniel Bischof. (2019). Party policy diffusion in the European multilevel space: what it is, how it works, and why it matters. Journal of Elections Public Opinion and Parties. 30(3). 339–357. 13 indexed citations
9.
Bischof, Daniel & Mariken Anna Catharina Geertruida van der Velden. (2019). The Use and Usefulness of p‐Values in Political Science: Introduction. Swiss Political Science Review. 25(3). 276–280. 1 indexed citations
10.
Bischof, Daniel & Markus Wagner. (2019). Do Voters Polarize When Radical Parties Enter Parliament?. American Journal of Political Science. 63(4). 888–904. 116 indexed citations
11.
Bischof, Daniel & Roman Senninger. (2017). Simple politics for the people? Complexity in campaign messages and political knowledge. European Journal of Political Research. 57(2). 473–495. 83 indexed citations
12.
Bischof, Daniel & Markus Wagner. (2017). What Makes Parties Adapt to Voter Preferences? The Role of Party Organization, Goals and Ideology. British Journal of Political Science. 50(1). 391–401. 29 indexed citations
13.
Senninger, Roman & Daniel Bischof. (2017). Working in unison: Political parties and policy issue transfer in the multilevel space. European Union Politics. 19(1). 140–162. 12 indexed citations
14.
Bernardi, Luca, et al.. (2017). The effects of the Fukushima disaster on nuclear energy debates and policies: a two-step comparative examination. Environmental Politics. 27(1). 42–68. 22 indexed citations
15.
Bischof, Daniel. (2017). New Graphic Schemes for Stata: Plotplain and Plottig. The Stata Journal Promoting communications on statistics and Stata. 17(3). 748–759. 150 indexed citations
16.
Bischof, Daniel. (2017). Ideological congruence between party rhetoric and policy-making. West European Politics. 41(2). 310–328. 11 indexed citations
17.
Bischof, Daniel. (2015). Towards a renewal of the niche party concept. Party Politics. 23(3). 220–235. 67 indexed citations
18.
Bischof, Daniel & Simon Fink. (2015). Repression as a Double‐edged Sword: Resilient Monarchs, Repression and Revolution in the Arab World. Swiss Political Science Review. 21(3). 377–395. 11 indexed citations
19.
Morales, Laura, et al.. (2013). External shocks and governmental responsiveness to public opinion. A case study of nuclear energy policy after the Fukushima disaster 1. 2 indexed citations
20.
Saalfeld, Thomas & Daniel Bischof. (2012). Minority-Ethnic MPs and the Substantive Representation of Minority Interests in the House of Commons, 2005-2011. Parliamentary Affairs. 66(2). 305–328. 79 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026