S.I. Schlachter

1.9k citations
67 papers · 1.5k indexed · h-index 21

S.I. Schlachter

67 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

S.I. Schlachter
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
  • Condensed Matter Physics 1.3k
  • Biomedical Engineering 859
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 297
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 477
  • Biomaterials 72
Replace Tengming Shen with:
Tengming Shen United States
H. Miao United States
Kathleen Amm United States
H. Jones United Kingdom
M. Strasik United States
V.S. Vysotsky Russia
A. Otto United States
M.P. Oomen Germany
N. Cheggour United States
U. Floegel-Delor Germany
S.I. Schlachter relative to Tengming Shen United States Tengming Shen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.5×
Tengming Shen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by S.I. Schlachter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of S.I. Schlachter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by S.I. Schlachter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites S.I. Schlachter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by S.I. Schlachter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by S.I. Schlachter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by S.I. Schlachter. The network helps show where S.I. Schlachter may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside S.I. Schlachter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with S.I. Schlachter Line = papers co-authored together S.I. Schlachter links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20251
2 20241
3 20237
4 20225
5 20222
6 20183
7 201615
8 201616
9
Thermal properties of materials for coated conductor Rutherford cables (CCRC)
20111
10 201013
11 20106
12 200927
13 200713
14 20062
15 200516
16
Concept for a low AC loss Roebel assembled coated conductor. (RACC)
20052
17 200515
18 200337
19 200239
20 199646

About S.I. Schlachter

S.I. Schlachter is a scholar working on Condensed Matter Physics, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 67 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (53 papers), Superconductivity in MgB2 and Alloys (39 papers), Superconducting Materials and Applications (34 papers), Iron-based superconductors research (11 papers), HVDC Systems and Fault Protection (8 papers), High-pressure geophysics and materials (5 papers), Magnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials (3 papers) and Magnesium Alloys: Properties and Applications (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Condensed Matter Physics (1.3k citations), Biomedical Engineering (859 citations) and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (297 citations). S.I. Schlachter has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Slovakia and Spain. Frequent co-authors include W. Goldacker, R. Heller, W.H. Fietz, Francesco Grilli, Klaus‐Peter Weiss, A. Kario, Enric Pardo, M. Vojenčiak, B. Ringsdorf and B. Obst. Their work appears in journals such as Experiments in Fluids, Physica C Superconductivity and Superconductor Science and Technology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026