M. Kläser

1.2k citations
42 papers · 948 indexed · h-index 16

M. Kläser

42 papers receiving 919 citations

Peers

M. Kläser
Comparison fields: 5 of 33
  • Condensed Matter Physics 867
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 394
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 250
  • Biomedical Engineering 232
  • Geophysics 63
Replace Kōshichi Noto with:
Kōshichi Noto Japan
M. Däumling Denmark
R. Meier-Hirmer Germany
J. M. Seuntjens United States
Hongbo Yang United States
Katsuzo Aihara Japan
M. R. Hahn United States
W. A. Fietz United States
Lev Dorosinskii Türkiye
Shoji Tanaka Shoji Tanaka Japan
M. Kläser relative to Kōshichi Noto Japan Kōshichi Noto's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Kōshichi Noto · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by M. Kläser

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. Kläser's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. Kläser with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. Kläser more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. Kläser

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. Kläser. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. Kläser. The network helps show where M. Kläser may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside M. Kläser, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with M. Kläser Line = papers co-authored together M. Kläser links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1
THE SECOND GENERATION OF SUPERCONDUCTING INSERTION DEVICES FOR ANKA
20061
2 200517
3 20045
4 200314
5 20036
6 200242
7 200236
8 200112
9 200115
10 19994
11 19999
12 199926
13 199936
14 199827
15 199836
16 199646
17 19962
18 199614
19 199565
20 199574

About M. Kläser

M. Kläser is a scholar working on Condensed Matter Physics, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Aerospace Engineering, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Nuclear and High Energy Physics, having authored 42 papers that have together received 948 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (33 papers), Advanced Condensed Matter Physics (15 papers), Magnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials (12 papers), Superconducting Materials and Applications (11 papers), Magnetic properties of thin films (10 papers), Particle accelerators and beam dynamics (10 papers), Superconductivity in MgB2 and Alloys (9 papers) and Particle Accelerators and Free-Electron Lasers (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Condensed Matter Physics (867 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (394 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (250 citations), Biomedical Engineering (232 citations) and Geophysics (63 citations). M. Kläser has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Russia and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include G. Müller‐Vogt, Th. Wolf, M. Sander, R. H. Koch, H. Küpfer, А. Zhukov, H. Claus, P. Schweiss, T. Wolf and H. Wühl. Their work appears in journals such as Physica C Superconductivity, Physical review. B, Condensed matter, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity, Physical Review Letters and Journal of Low Temperature Physics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026