Shoji Kuretake

918 total citations
9 papers, 784 citations indexed

About

Shoji Kuretake is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Molecular Biology. According to data from OpenAlex, Shoji Kuretake has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 784 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Reproductive Medicine, 6 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 3 papers in Molecular Biology. Recurrent topics in Shoji Kuretake's work include Sperm and Testicular Function (7 papers), Reproductive Biology and Fertility (6 papers) and Animal Genetics and Reproduction (2 papers). Shoji Kuretake is often cited by papers focused on Sperm and Testicular Function (7 papers), Reproductive Biology and Fertility (6 papers) and Animal Genetics and Reproduction (2 papers). Shoji Kuretake collaborates with scholars based in Japan, United States and Poland. Shoji Kuretake's co-authors include Ryuzo Yanagimachi, Yasuyuki Kimura, Kazuhiko Hoshi, Hiroko Yanagimachi, Anthony C.F. Perry, Akira Sato, Hitomi Yamanaka, Ryoji Yao, Chizuru Ito and Kaoru Yanagida and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Fertility and Sterility and Biology of Reproduction.

In The Last Decade

Shoji Kuretake

9 papers receiving 766 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Shoji Kuretake Japan	8	591	548	321	274	68	9	784
Thomas Karaouzène France	9	519 0.9×	572 1.0×	346 1.1×	285 1.0×	73 1.1×	10	790
Sandra Yassine France	7	473 0.8×	517 0.9×	291 0.9×	268 1.0×	54 0.8×	7	728
Xiuhong Cui China	15	279 0.5×	280 0.5×	281 0.9×	487 1.8×	73 1.1×	27	749
Merja Markkula Finland	15	329 0.6×	299 0.5×	382 1.2×	414 1.5×	73 1.1×	25	815
Yan-Wei Sha China	13	283 0.5×	385 0.7×	353 1.1×	213 0.8×	69 1.0×	29	570
Sophie Pennetier France	9	381 0.6×	124 0.2×	204 0.6×	340 1.2×	46 0.7×	10	555
Mariem Ben Khelifa France	7	351 0.6×	435 0.8×	347 1.1×	249 0.9×	68 1.0×	12	626
Libin Mei China	17	475 0.8×	611 1.1×	562 1.8×	322 1.2×	97 1.4×	33	872
Zhiyong Ji China	15	360 0.6×	491 0.9×	439 1.4×	290 1.1×	73 1.1×	40	730
P. van Maurik Netherlands	7	379 0.6×	253 0.5×	107 0.3×	136 0.5×	42 0.6×	7	558

Countries citing papers authored by Shoji Kuretake

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Shoji Kuretake's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Shoji Kuretake with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Shoji Kuretake more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Shoji Kuretake

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Shoji Kuretake. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Shoji Kuretake. The network helps show where Shoji Kuretake may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Shoji Kuretake

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Shoji Kuretake. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Shoji Kuretake based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Shoji Kuretake. Shoji Kuretake is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

1.

Fujimori, Keiya, et al.. (2004). An omphalopagus parasitic twin after intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Fertility and Sterility. 82(5). 1430–1432. 18 indexed citations

2.

Yao, Ryoji, Chizuru Ito, Yasuko Natsume, et al.. (2002). Lack of acrosome formation in mice lacking a Golgi protein, GOPC. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 99(17). 11211–11216. 233 indexed citations

3.

Iwama, Hiroshi, et al.. (2000). Serum concentrations of soluble Fas antigen and soluble Fas ligand in mother and newborn. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 263(3). 108–110. 9 indexed citations

4.

Sasagawa, Isoji, Shoji Kuretake, John J. Eppig, & Ryuzo Yanagimachi. (1998). Mouse Primary Spermatocytes Can Complete Two Meiotic Divisions within the Oocyte Cytoplasm1. Biology of Reproduction. 58(1). 248–254. 46 indexed citations

5.

Maleszewski, Marek, et al.. (1998). Behavior of Transgenic Mouse Spermatozoa with Galline Protamine1. Biology of Reproduction. 58(1). 8–14. 14 indexed citations

6.

Kimura, Yasuyuki, et al.. (1998). Analysis of Mouse Oocyte Activation Suggests the Involvement of Sperm Perinuclear Material1. Biology of Reproduction. 58(6). 1407–1415. 193 indexed citations

7.

Kuretake, Shoji, et al.. (1996). Inadequate function of sterile tw5/tw32 spermatozoa overcome by intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Molecular Reproduction and Development. 44(2). 230–233. 5 indexed citations

8.

Kuretake, Shoji, Yasuyuki Kimura, Kazuhiko Hoshi, & Ryuzo Yanagimachi. (1996). Fertilization and Development of Mouse Oocytes Injected with Isolated Sperm Heads1. Biology of Reproduction. 55(4). 789–795. 245 indexed citations

9.

Kuretake, Shoji, et al.. (1996). Inadequate function of steriletw5/tw32 spermatozoa overcome by intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Molecular Reproduction and Development. 44(2). 230–233. 21 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact