Shih‐Cheng Chang
- Infectious Diseases top 2%
- Molecular Biology
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine top 5%
- Epidemiology top 5%
- Agronomy and Crop Science top 2%
- Co-authors
- Shin‐Ru ShihJang‐Jih LuGuang‐Wu ChenTzu‐Chun ChenJing‐Yi LinTsui-Ping LiuChi-Jene ChenPi‐Yueh Chang
- Topics
- Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus (18 papers)Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing (13 papers)Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing (12 papers)
- Partner nations
- TaiwanUnited StatesJapan
In The Last Decade
Shih‐Cheng Chang
71 papers receiving 1.8k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 121
- Infectious Diseases 686
- Molecular Biology 617
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 603
- Epidemiology 553
- Agronomy and Crop Science 326
Countries citing papers authored by Shih‐Cheng Chang
This map shows the geographic impact of Shih‐Cheng Chang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Shih‐Cheng Chang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Shih‐Cheng Chang more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Shih‐Cheng Chang
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Shih‐Cheng Chang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Shih‐Cheng Chang. The network helps show where Shih‐Cheng Chang may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Shih‐Cheng Chang
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Shih‐Cheng Chang. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Shih‐Cheng Chang based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Shih‐Cheng Chang. Shih‐Cheng Chang is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 20 | |
| 4 | 8 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 6 | |
| 7 | 7 | |
| 8 | 65 | |
| 9 | 17 | |
| 10 | 12 | |
| 11 | 25 | |
| 12 | 48 | |
| 13 | 3 | |
| 14 | 50 | |
| 15 | 75 | |
| 16 | 69 | |
| 17 | 45 | |
| 18 | 224 | |
| 19 | 145 | |
| 20 | [Preparation of toxoid from Taiwan cobra (Naja naja atra) venom]. | 2 |
About Shih‐Cheng Chang
Shih‐Cheng Chang is a scholar working on Clinical Biochemistry, Infectious Diseases and Agronomy and Crop Science, having authored 72 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus (18 papers), Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing (13 papers) and Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Infectious Diseases (686 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (326 citations) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (603 citations). Shih‐Cheng Chang has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, United States and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Shin‐Ru Shih, Jang‐Jih Lu, Guang‐Wu Chen, Tzu‐Chun Chen, Jing‐Yi Lin, Shin‐Ru Shih, Tsui-Ping Liu, Chi-Jene Chen, Pi‐Yueh Chang and Victor Stollar. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Biological Chemistry, Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.