Wen‐Ling Kuo

1.4k total citations
60 papers, 805 citations indexed

About

Wen‐Ling Kuo is a scholar working on Surgery, Cancer Research and Genetics. According to data from OpenAlex, Wen‐Ling Kuo has authored 60 papers receiving a total of 805 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 27 papers in Surgery, 16 papers in Cancer Research and 11 papers in Genetics. Recurrent topics in Wen‐Ling Kuo's work include Breast Implant and Reconstruction (19 papers), Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques (19 papers) and Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (12 papers). Wen‐Ling Kuo is often cited by papers focused on Breast Implant and Reconstruction (19 papers), Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques (19 papers) and Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (12 papers). Wen‐Ling Kuo collaborates with scholars based in Taiwan, United States and Switzerland. Wen‐Ling Kuo's co-authors include Jung‐Ju Huang, Yi Xiao, Jun Yao, Yohei Saito, Dihua Yu, Ping Li, Shin‐Cheh Chen, Ming‐Chin Yu, David Cheong and Xuedong Yin and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, Blood and Cancer Cell.

In The Last Decade

Wen‐Ling Kuo

53 papers receiving 799 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Wen‐Ling Kuo Taiwan 15 266 196 193 192 115 60 805
Woon Yong Jung South Korea 18 339 1.3× 187 1.0× 145 0.8× 203 1.1× 79 0.7× 41 783
Daniëlle Raats Netherlands 15 391 1.5× 154 0.8× 114 0.6× 325 1.7× 158 1.4× 28 818
Ghil Suk Yoon South Korea 15 291 1.1× 109 0.6× 150 0.8× 254 1.3× 68 0.6× 48 896
Koichi Sakaguchi Japan 17 182 0.7× 165 0.8× 180 0.9× 232 1.2× 65 0.6× 73 680
Moubin Lin China 16 333 1.3× 218 1.1× 288 1.5× 413 2.2× 131 1.1× 54 978
Qiang Zuo China 13 417 1.6× 200 1.0× 109 0.6× 315 1.6× 79 0.7× 39 805
Jeanie Wu Singapore 13 552 2.1× 258 1.3× 108 0.6× 218 1.1× 76 0.7× 14 904
Naotake Funamizu Japan 15 374 1.4× 294 1.5× 255 1.3× 516 2.7× 149 1.3× 82 1.1k
Virginie Defamie Canada 11 328 1.2× 268 1.4× 102 0.5× 210 1.1× 109 0.9× 13 751
Mikio Kawamura Japan 21 400 1.5× 333 1.7× 224 1.2× 501 2.6× 136 1.2× 64 1.2k

Countries citing papers authored by Wen‐Ling Kuo

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Wen‐Ling Kuo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Wen‐Ling Kuo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wen‐Ling Kuo more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Wen‐Ling Kuo

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Wen‐Ling Kuo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Wen‐Ling Kuo. The network helps show where Wen‐Ling Kuo may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Wen‐Ling Kuo

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Wen‐Ling Kuo. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Wen‐Ling Kuo based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Wen‐Ling Kuo. Wen‐Ling Kuo is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Cheong, David, et al.. (2025). Technical Pearls for Breast Reconstruction in Low BMI Asian Women With the Profunda Artery Perforator Flap. Microsurgery. 45(1). e70009–e70009.
2.
Taher, Alì, Vip Viprakasit, Antonis Kattamis, et al.. (2025). Efficacy and safety of luspatercept in non–transfusion-dependent β-thalassemia: long-term results from the BEYOND study. Blood Advances. 9(23). 6108–6119.
3.
Ryu, Jai Min, Chi Wei Mok, Antonio Toesca, et al.. (2025). Consensus Statement on Robotic Nipple Sparing Mastectomy Expert Panel. Journal of Breast Cancer. 28(3). 180–180.
4.
Kuo, Wen‐Ling, et al.. (2025). Comparative analysis of oncological and surgical outcomes of robotic versus conventional mastectomy for breast cancer. European Journal of Surgical Oncology. 51(5). 109622–109622. 1 indexed citations
5.
6.
Chang, Tommy Nai‐Jen, Jing Lu, David Cheong, et al.. (2025). Breast neurotization along with breast reconstruction after nipple sparing mastectomy enhances quality of life and reduces denervation symptoms in patient-reported outcome: a prospective cohort study. International Journal of Surgery. 111(5). 3235–3247. 2 indexed citations
7.
8.
Kuo, Kevin H.M., Pranee Sutcharitchan, Ping Chong Bee, et al.. (2023). Efficacy and Safety of Luspatercept in Patients with HbE/β-Thalassemia from the BELIEVE Study: A Subgroup Analysis. Blood. 142(Supplement 1). 3848–3848. 1 indexed citations
9.
Cappellini, Maria Domenica, Alì Taher, Vip Viprakasit, et al.. (2023). Efficacy and Safety of Luspatercept in Patients Enrolled in the BELIEVE Trial: Data from the Phase 3b Long-Term Rollover Study. Blood. 142(Supplement 1). 3849–3849. 1 indexed citations
10.
11.
Chen, Jenhui, et al.. (2021). Online Textual Symptomatic Assessment Chatbot Based on Q&A Weighted Scoring for Female Breast Cancer Prescreening. Applied Sciences. 11(11). 5079–5079. 10 indexed citations
12.
Kuo, Wen‐Ling, Che‐Chang Chang, Chih‐Jung Chen, et al.. (2021). Prognostic Significance of O-GlcNAc and PKM2 in Hormone Receptor-Positive and HER2-Nonenriched Breast Cancer. Diagnostics. 11(8). 1460–1460. 7 indexed citations
13.
Su, Chun-Lin, et al.. (2021). Direct-to-implant breast reconstruction following nipple-sparing mastectomy: predictive factors of adverse surgical outcomes in Asian patients. Archives of Plastic Surgery. 48(5). 483–493. 3 indexed citations
14.
Huang, Jung‐Ju, et al.. (2021). Robotic-assisted nipple-sparing mastectomy followed by immediate microsurgical free flap reconstruction: Feasibility and aesthetic results – Case series. International Journal of Surgery. 95. 106143–106143. 21 indexed citations
15.
Kuo, Wen‐Ling, Chi‐Chang Yu, Hsiu-Pei Tsai, et al.. (2021). Factors affecting locoregional recurrence in breast cancer patients undergoing surgery following neoadjuvant treatment. BMC Surgery. 21(1). 160–160. 11 indexed citations
16.
Chao, Angel, Yi‐Hao Lin, Lan‐Yan Yang, et al.. (2019). BRCA1/2mutation status in patients with metachronous breast and ovarian malignancies: clues towards the implementation of genetic counseling. Journal of Gynecologic Oncology. 31(3). e24–e24. 6 indexed citations
17.
Xu, Jia, Sunil Acharya, Özgür Şahin, et al.. (2015). 14-3-3ζ Turns TGF-β’s Function from Tumor Suppressor to Metastasis Promoter in Breast Cancer by Contextual Changes of Smad Partners from p53 to Gli2. Cancer Cell. 27(2). 177–192. 144 indexed citations
18.
Máspero, Jorge, Iván Chérrez-Ojeda, Dennis E. Doherty, et al.. (2014). Appraisal of lens opacity with mometasone furoate/formoterol fumarate combination in patients with COPD or asthma. Respiratory Medicine. 108(9). 1355–1362. 5 indexed citations
19.
Bernstein, David I., Jacques Hébert, Amarjit Cheema, et al.. (2011). Efficacy and onset of action of mometasone furoate/formoterol and fluticasone propionate/salmeterol combination treatment in subjects with persistent asthma. Allergy Asthma and Clinical Immunology. 7(1). 21–21. 12 indexed citations
20.
Kuo, Wen‐Ling, et al.. (2011). Imatinib Mesylate Improves Liver Regeneration and Attenuates Liver Fibrogenesis in CCL4-Treated Mice. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery. 16(2). 361–369. 22 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Woon Yong Jung Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Daniëlle Raats Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Ghil Suk Yoon Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Koichi Sakaguchi Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Moubin Lin Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Qiang Zuo Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jeanie Wu Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Naotake Funamizu Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Virginie Defamie Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Mikio Kawamura
Rankless by CCL
2026