Meiling Li

932 citations
23 papers · 779 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Meiling Li

22 papers receiving 775 citations

Peers

Meiling Li
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 575
  • Infectious Diseases 204
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 85
  • Animal Science and Zoology 60
  • Molecular Biology 396
Replace Yuwan Li with:
Yuwan Li China
Qi Jin China
Shih-Yeh Lin Taiwan
Bo Tang China
Lu Lv China
Theresa Schwaiger Germany
Xiuling Li China
Jin’en Wu China
Xiaoyu Guo China
Meiling Li relative to Yuwan Li China Yuwan Li's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×13.3×
Yuwan Li · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Meiling Li

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Meiling Li's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Meiling Li with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Meiling Li more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Meiling Li

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Meiling Li. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Meiling Li. The network helps show where Meiling Li may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Meiling Li, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Meiling Li Line = papers co-authored together Meiling Li links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2002145
2 2009123
3 2011106
4 202061
5 200457
6 201350
7 201939
8 201636
9 202229
10 202129
11 202029
12 202220
13 202410
14 201910
15 20218
16 20228
17 20226
18 20225
19 20043
20 20212

About Meiling Li

Meiling Li is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Molecular Biology, Epidemiology, Surgery and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 23 papers that have together received 779 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Viral Infections and Immunology Research (10 papers), RNA Research and Splicing (7 papers), RNA regulation and disease (6 papers), RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (6 papers), Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (5 papers), Infective Endocarditis Diagnosis and Management (4 papers), Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications (2 papers) and Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (575 citations), Infectious Diseases (204 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (85 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (60 citations) and Molecular Biology (396 citations). Meiling Li has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and Taiwan. Frequent co-authors include Shin‐Ru Shih, Victor Stollar, Kuo‐Feng Weng, Chuan-Tien Hung, Jin‐Ching Lee, Tzu‐Chun Chen, Blanton S. Tolbert, Shih‐Cheng Chang, Chiann-Chyi Chen and Tsu‐An Hsu. Their work appears in journals such as Composites Part B Engineering, PLoS Pathogens, Journal of Biomedical Science, ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering and Buildings.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact