Shih‐Jen Tsai
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 0.1%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 0.5%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 0.2%
- Molecular Biology top 2%
- Biological Psychiatry top 0.05%
- Co-authors
- Chen‐Jee HongAlbert C. YangYounger W.‐Y. YuYa‐Mei BaiMu‐Hong ChenTung‐Ping SuYing‐Jay LiouCheng‐Ta Li
- Topics
- Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (90 papers)Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (84 papers)Tryptophan and brain disorders (80 papers)
- Journals
- Nature CommunicationsJournal of Clinical OncologySHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
- Partner nations
- TaiwanUnited StatesChina
In The Last Decade
Shih‐Jen Tsai
662 papers receiving 16.5k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 181
- Psychiatry and Mental health 4.5k
- Cognitive Neuroscience 4.1k
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 3.7k
- Molecular Biology 2.6k
- Biological Psychiatry 2.3k
Countries citing papers authored by Shih‐Jen Tsai
This map shows the geographic impact of Shih‐Jen Tsai's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Shih‐Jen Tsai with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Shih‐Jen Tsai more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Shih‐Jen Tsai
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Shih‐Jen Tsai. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Shih‐Jen Tsai. The network helps show where Shih‐Jen Tsai may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Shih‐Jen Tsai
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Shih‐Jen Tsai. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Shih‐Jen Tsai based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Shih‐Jen Tsai. Shih‐Jen Tsai is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 0 | |
| 8 | 5 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 7 | |
| 11 | 7 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 3 | |
| 14 | 4 | |
| 15 | 5 | |
| 16 | 46 | |
| 17 | 12 | |
| 18 | 25 | |
| 19 | 21 | |
| 20 | Amisulpride versus risperidone in the treatment of schizophrenic patients: a double-blind pilot study in Taiwan. | 30 |
About Shih‐Jen Tsai
Shih‐Jen Tsai is a scholar working on Biological Psychiatry, Psychiatry and Mental health and Behavioral Neuroscience, having authored 689 papers that have together received 16.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (90 papers), Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (84 papers) and Tryptophan and brain disorders (80 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (2.3k citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (1.2k citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (4.5k citations). Shih‐Jen Tsai has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, United States and China. Frequent co-authors include Chen‐Jee Hong, Albert C. Yang, Younger W.‐Y. Yu, Ya‐Mei Bai, Mu‐Hong Chen, Tung‐Ping Su, Ying‐Jay Liou, Cheng‐Ta Li, Tai‐Jui Chen and Tzeng‐Ji Chen. Their work appears in journals such as Nature Communications, Journal of Clinical Oncology and SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.