Shengjin Ge

530 citations
35 papers · 390 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Shengjin Ge

33 papers receiving 389 citations

Peers

Shengjin Ge
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
  • Developmental Neuroscience 104
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 106
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 110
  • Biological Psychiatry 18
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 23
Replace Yongzheng Han with:
Yongzheng Han China
Xinning Mi China
Tianlong Wang China
Xiaoyu Yang China
Xianzhang Zeng China
Ming Tian China
Bo Gui China
Cansheng Gong China
Shengjin Ge relative to Yongzheng Han China Yongzheng Han's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10.5×
Yongzheng Han · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Shengjin Ge

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Shengjin Ge's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Shengjin Ge with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Shengjin Ge more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Shengjin Ge

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Shengjin Ge. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Shengjin Ge. The network helps show where Shengjin Ge may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Shengjin Ge, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Shengjin Ge Line = papers co-authored together Shengjin Ge links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201346
2 201543
3 201938
4 201831
5 202025
6 201224
7 201820
8 201320
9 202418
10 201916
11 201313
12 20128
13 20167
14 20217
15 20147
16 20216
17 20116
18 20136
19 20235
20 20204

About Shengjin Ge

Shengjin Ge is a scholar working on Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Surgery, Developmental Neuroscience and Physiology, having authored 35 papers that have together received 390 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research (10 papers), Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (9 papers), Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (7 papers), Airway Management and Intubation Techniques (6 papers), Anesthesia and Pain Management (6 papers), Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (5 papers), Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology (4 papers) and Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Neuroscience (104 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (106 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (110 citations), Biological Psychiatry (18 citations) and Geriatrics and Gerontology (23 citations). Shengjin Ge has collaborated with scholars based in China and United States. Frequent co-authors include Zhanggang Xue, Bei Wang, Hui‐Chuan Sun, Lu Wang, Peiwen Zhou, Hui Jiang, Hui Xu, Jin Liu, Changhong Miao and Buwei Yu. Their work appears in journals such as BMC Anesthesiology, Experimental Gerontology, Inflammation Research, Pharmacology and Journal of Surgical Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact