Shelley Lucas
- Orthopedics and Sports Medicine top 5%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 10%
- Social Psychology
- Sociology and Political Science
- Gender Studies top 10%
- Co-authors
- Lynda B. RansdellMary E. PritchardYong GaoLinda PetlichkoffJennifer WhiteNicole D. BolterPak‐Kwong ChungKurt Nilsson
- Topics
- Sports, Gender, and Society (5 papers)Sport and Mega-Event Impacts (4 papers)Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports (3 papers)
- Cited by
- Orthopedics and Sports MedicinePhysical Therapy, Sports Therapy and RehabilitationDevelopmental and Educational Psychology
- Journals
- The Journal of Strength and Conditioning ResearchInternational Review for the Sociology of SportInternational Journal of Sports Science & Coaching
- Partner nations
- United StatesHong Kong
In The Last Decade
Shelley Lucas
11 papers receiving 363 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
- Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 203
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 85
- Social Psychology 71
- Sociology and Political Science 54
- Gender Studies 49
Countries citing papers authored by Shelley Lucas
This map shows the geographic impact of Shelley Lucas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Shelley Lucas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Shelley Lucas more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Shelley Lucas
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Shelley Lucas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Shelley Lucas. The network helps show where Shelley Lucas may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Shelley Lucas
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Shelley Lucas. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Shelley Lucas based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Shelley Lucas. Shelley Lucas is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | 225 | |
| 8 | 24 | |
| 9 | 30 | |
| 10 | 18 | |
| 11 | 34 | |
| 12 | 7 | |
| 13 | 0 | |
| 14 | Courting Controversy: Gender and Power in Iowa Girls’ Basketball | 2 |
| 15 | 33 |
About Shelley Lucas
Shelley Lucas is a scholar working on Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation, Gender Studies and Conservation, having authored 15 papers that have together received 381 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sports, Gender, and Society (5 papers), Sport and Mega-Event Impacts (4 papers) and Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (203 citations), Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (36 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (85 citations). Shelley Lucas has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include Lynda B. Ransdell, Mary E. Pritchard, Yong Gao, Linda Petlichkoff, Jennifer White, Nicole D. Bolter, Pak‐Kwong Chung, Kurt Nilsson, Ka Man Leung and Nicole M. LaVoi. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, International Review for the Sociology of Sport and International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.