Shale Wong
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology top 2%
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
- Sociology and Political Science
- Co-authors
- Mark EarnestSteven G. FedericoJudith H. MaselliRalph GonzalesBonnie Leeman-CastilloJudith E. GlaznerKitty CorbettKaren Kafadar
- Topics
- Child and Adolescent Health (4 papers)Innovations in Medical Education (3 papers)Health Policy Implementation Science (2 papers)
- Cited by
- Applied Microbiology and BiotechnologyGeneral Health ProfessionsIssues, ethics and legal aspects
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
Shale Wong
17 papers receiving 420 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
- General Health Professions 261
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 132
- Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 83
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 59
- Sociology and Political Science 56
Countries citing papers authored by Shale Wong
This map shows the geographic impact of Shale Wong's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Shale Wong with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Shale Wong more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Shale Wong
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Shale Wong. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Shale Wong. The network helps show where Shale Wong may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Shale Wong
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Shale Wong. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Shale Wong based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Shale Wong. Shale Wong is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 6 | |
| 6 | 0 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 8 | |
| 10 | 19 | |
| 11 | 3 | |
| 12 | 33 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 11 | |
| 15 | 50 | |
| 16 | 185 | |
| 17 | 51 | |
| 18 | 0 | |
| 19 | 61 |
About Shale Wong
Shale Wong is a scholar working on Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, Family Practice and General Health Professions, having authored 19 papers that have together received 440 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child and Adolescent Health (4 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (3 papers) and Health Policy Implementation Science (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (83 citations), General Health Professions (261 citations) and Issues, ethics and legal aspects (12 citations). Shale Wong has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Mark Earnest, Steven G. Federico, Judith H. Maselli, Ralph Gonzales, Bonnie Leeman-Castillo, Judith E. Glazner, Kitty Corbett, Karen Kafadar, Paul J. Chung and Rita S. Lee. Their work appears in journals such as PEDIATRICS, The Journal of Pediatrics and Medical Care.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.