Mark Earnest

1.6k citations
29 papers · 1.1k · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Mark Earnest

25 papers receiving 996 citations

Peers

Mark Earnest
Comparison fields: 5 of 109
  • Family Practice 85
  • Health Information Management 166
  • Medical Terminology 6
  • General Health Professions 340
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 10
Replace Stewart Babbott with:
Stewart Babbott United States
Sara Poplau United States
Sandra Applebaum United States
Tara F. Bishop United States
Leigh Stuckhardt
Ilana Graetz United States
Shira H. Fischer United States
Janice D. Walker United States
Elizabeth Wenghofer Canada
Michelle Myall United Kingdom
Mark Earnest relative to Stewart Babbott United States Stewart Babbott's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Stewart Babbott · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Earnest

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Earnest's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Earnest with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Earnest more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Earnest

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Earnest. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Earnest. The network helps show where Mark Earnest may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Earnest, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Earnest Line = papers co-authored together Mark Earnest links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004228
2 2009190
3 2004158
4 2000128
5 200266
6 201151
7 201442
8 202038
9 200826
10 201724
11 202021
12 202013
13 202010
14 201110
15 201410
16 20199
17 19937
18 20166
19 20196
20 19956

About Mark Earnest

Mark Earnest is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Education, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 29 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovations in Medical Education (9 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (6 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (5 papers), Healthcare cost, quality, practices (3 papers), Problem and Project Based Learning (3 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (3 papers), Global Health Workforce Issues (2 papers) and Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (85 citations), Health Information Management (166 citations), Medical Terminology (6 citations), General Health Professions (340 citations) and Issues, ethics and legal aspects (10 citations). Mark Earnest has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Chen‐Tan Lin, Stephen E. Ross, Laurie Moore, Loretta Wittevrongel, Steven G. Federico, Shale Wong, John F. Steiner, Barbara F. Brandt, Eva Aagaard and Rita S. Lee. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of General Internal Medicine, Academic Medicine, Journal of Interprofessional Care, New England Journal of Medicine and Journal of Medical Internet Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact